Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Hepatol. Sep 18, 2017; 9(26): 1081-1091
Published online Sep 18, 2017. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i26.1081
Table 3 Role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance in assessment of treatment response[75-79]
Ref.Treatment modalityTumor typeDW-MR parameter evaluatedStudy results/teaching point
Chapiro et al[79]TACEHCC(3D) quantitative enhancement-based and DW volumetric MRHigh accuracy and intermethod agreement of 3D quantitative techniques in the assessment of tumor necrosis after TACE is clinically relevant
High diagnostic performance of qEASL criteria and qADC may help in triaging patients for repeat treatment after a TACE session
Mannelli et al[87]TACEHCCADC measured with DWI in treatment responsePre TACE ADC obtained at 0, 50, 500 s/mm2b values before and after treatment may be used to predict HCC response to TACE
Park et al[42]RadiotherapyHCCDW MR vs conventional MR for treatment responseImproved detection of viable tumor when DW MR is added to conventional sequences
Yu et al[76]Radiation therapyHCCDW MRChange in ADC value before and after RT is related to local progression free survival. Hence ADC value and RECIST may substitute for mRECIST in patients who cannot receive contrast agents
Schraml et al[77]Radiofrequencyn = 16 HCC, 1 = cholangiocarcinoma, and 37 = metastases (28 colorectal cancer, 3 melanoma, 3 breast cancer, 1 pancreatic cancer, 1 gastric cancer, esophageal cancer)DW MR and mean ADC valuesADC-based evaluation of signal alterations adjacent to the ablation zone may contribute to the identification of local tumor progression and nontumoral post- treatment tissue changes
Ablation