Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Hepatol. Jul 28, 2017; 9(21): 930-944
Published online Jul 28, 2017. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i21.930
Published online Jul 28, 2017. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i21.930
Table 4 Multivariate analysis of predictors of small for size syndrome (Binary logistic regression)
| P value | Exp(B) | 95%CI for EXP (B) | ||
| Upper | Lower | |||
| Pre LT PHTN | 0.998 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
| Steatosis | 0.060 | 0.145 | 0.020 | 1.074 |
| Graft type | 0.166 | 6.407 | 0.463 | 88.717 |
| Actual GRWR < 0.8 | 0.050 | 4.303 | 1.024 | 18.082 |
| Actual graft WT | 0.030 | 1.004 | 1.000 | 1.008 |
| Intraoperative plasma transfusion (units) | 0.235 | 0.963 | 0.905 | 1.025 |
- Citation: Shoreem H, Gad EH, Soliman H, Hegazy O, Saleh S, Zakaria H, Ayoub E, Kamel Y, Abouelella K, Ibrahim T, Marawan I. Small for size syndrome difficult dilemma: Lessons from 10 years single centre experience in living donor liver transplantation. World J Hepatol 2017; 9(21): 930-944
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v9/i21/930.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v9.i21.930