Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Hepatol. Jul 18, 2017; 9(20): 867-883
Published online Jul 18, 2017. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i20.867
Table 2 Clinical studies in hepatocellular carcinoma that involved health related quality of life assessment
Ref.YearStudy typenHCC statusIntervention(s)HRQOL instruments usedHRQOL assessment time point(s)Remarks
Poon et al[34]2001Cohort76Resectable and unresectableResection (66) vs TACE (10)FACT-GBaseline, 3, 6, 7, 12, 18 and 24 moObservational study with QOL assessment during treatment
Brans et al[40]2002Cohort26UnresectableSIRT (14) vs TACE (14)EORTC QLQ-C30Baseline, 1 and 3 moObservational study with QOL assessment during treatment
Bianchi et al[32]2002Case-control101Any stageNASF-36BaselineTo describe symptomatology and/or HRQOL of HCC patients -HRQOL of HCC patients compared to 202 matched cirrhotic patients
Chow et al[59]2002Phase III trial329UnresectableTamoxifen 120 mg/d (121) vs tamoxifen 60 mg/d (76) vs placebo (132)Global QOL domain of EORTC QLQ-C30Baseline, then every 1 moPhase III trial with HRQOL endpoint
Steel et al[46]2004Cohort28Allocated to SIRT or TACESIRT (14) vs TACE (14)FACT-Hep, HepCS, TOI, FHSI8Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 moObservational study with QOL assessment during treatment. Included in[97]
Poon et al[47]2004Randomized phase II trial88Allocated to TACEBranched chained amino acid vs controlFACT-GBaseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 moPhase II trial with HRQOL endpoint
Steel et al[84]2005Cohort82Any stageVarious treatmentsFACT-Hep, HepCS, TOI, FHSI8Baseline, 3 and 6 moTo describe symptomatology and/or HRQOL of HCC patients -Compared HRQOL between patients and proxy-raters. Included in[97]
Steel et al[96]2005Case-control21TNM stage III or IVNAFACT-Hep, Sexual History QuestionnaireBaselineTo describe symptomatology and/or HRQOL of HCC patients - Included 23 patients with chronic liver disease
Barbare et al[58]2005Phase III trial420Not eligible for resection or local treatmentTamoxifen (210) vs control (210)Spitzer QoL indexBaseline, then every 3 moPhase III trial with HRQOL endpoint
Kirchhoff et al[48]2005Randomized phase II trial70Eligible for TACETACE with microspheres (35) vs TACE (35)Global QOL of EORTC QLQ-C30Baseline, then every 6 moPhase II trial with HRQOL endpoint
Steel et al[97]2006Combined analysis of 3 studies157Mixed patient populations from 3 studiesVarious treatmentsFACT-Hep, HepCS, TOI, FHSI8Baseline, 3 and 6 moObservational study with QOL assessment during treatment - evaluates minimally important difference in HRQOL
Eid et al[36]2006Cohort7Allocated to hepatic ablation or resectionHepatic ablation (3) vs resection (4)EORTC QLQ-C30, FACT-Hep, FHSI8, Profile of Mood States (POMS)Baseline, postoperative visit, 1.5, 3 and 6 moObservational study with QOL assessment during treatment. Study included other liver tumor types (33 patients)
Yeo et al[65]2006Combined analysis of 2 phase III trials233Unresectable or metastaticChemotherapy, hormonal therapyEORTC QLQ-C30BaselineAs prognostic tools for overall survival - baseline HRQOL was prognostic of overall survival in advanced HCC
Wang et al[98]2006Cohort83Non-metastatic, 3 nodules or lessTACE + RFA (43) vs TACE (40)FACT-GBaseline, 3 moObservational study with QOL assessment during treatment
Cebon et al[49]2006Phase I/II trial63Not eligible for standard therapiesOctreotide long acting releaseFACT-Hep, patient disease and treatment assessment form (Pt DATA form), patient benefit formBaseline, then every 1 moPhase I/II trial with HRQOL endpoint
Llovet et al[12]2006Phase III trial602Not eligible for local treatment or had disease progression after surgery or local treatmentSorafenib (299) vs placebo (303)FHSI-8Baseline then every 3 wkPhase III trial with HRQOL endpoint
Lee et al[31]2007Case control161Any stageSurgical, TACE, percutaneous ethanol injection, supportive careEORTC QLQ-C30, WHOQOL-BREFCross sectional one-time assessmentTo describe symptomatology and/or HRQOL of HCC patients - compared with national matched healthy controls
Kondo et al[37]2007Case-control97Non-metastatic, 3 nodules or lessPercutaneous ablationSF-36BaselineTo describe symptomatology and/or HRQOL of HCC patients - HRQOL compared to 97 matched chronic liver disease controls, and normal population values
Steel et al[33]2007Case-control83Any stageNAFACT-HepBaselineTo describe symptomatology and/or HRQOL of HCC patients - HRQOL compared to 51 matched chronic liver disease controls, and 138 controls from general population
Martin et al[35]2007Cohort4ResectableResectionEORTC QLQ-C30, FACT-Hep, FHSI-8Baseline, discharge, postoperative visit, 1.5, 3, 6 and 12 moObservational study with QOL assessment during treatment. Included 28 patients with other liver tumors
Becker et al[50]2007Randomized phase II trial120Not eligible for resection or local treatmentOctreotide (61) vs placebo (59)EORTC QLQ-C30Baseline, 1, 3 mo, then every 3 moPhase II trial with HRQOL endpoint
Dimitroulopoulos et al[51]2007Randomized phase II trial127Advanced stage. Somatostatin receptor overexpression for randomisationOctreotide (31) vs placebo (30) observation (66)EORTC QLQ-C30Baseline then every 1 moPhase II trial with HRQOL endpoint
Sun et al[99]2008Cohort22Mainly advanced diseaseVarious treatmentsFACT-Hep, Functional assessment of chronic illness therapy spirituality subscale (FACIT-Sp-12 )Baseline, 1, 2 and 3 moObservational study with QOL assessment during treatment. Included 23 patients with pancreatic cancer
Méndez Romero et al[52]2008Phase I/II trial9Not eligible for other local treatmentsSBRTEORTC QLQ-C30 EQ-5D VASBaseline, 1, 3 and 6 moObservational study with QOL assessment during treatment. Included 19 patients with liver metastases. Phase I/II trial with HRQOL endpoint
Bonnetain et al[66]2008Combined analysis of 2 phase III trials[59,101]538Not eligible for resection, transplantation or percutaneous ablationTamoxifen vs supportive care; TACE + tamoxifen vs tamoxifenSpitzer QoL indexBaselineAs prognostic tools for overall survival - baseline HRQOL was prognostic of overall survival in advanced HCC
Doffoël et al[100]2008Phase III trial138Eligible for TACETACE + tamoxifen (70) vs tamoxifen (68)Spitzer QoL indexBaseline, then every 2 mo during treatment, every 3 mo after treatmentPhase III trial with HRQOL endpoint
Barbare et al[60]2009Phase III trial272Not eligible for curative treatmentOctreotide (135) vs placebo (137)EORTC QLQ-C30Baseline, then every 1 mo during treatment, every 3 mo after treatmentPhase III trial with HRQOL endpoint
Cheng et al[13]2009Phase III trial271Unresectable or metastatic, no prior systemic therapySorafenib (150) vs placebo (76)FHSI-8. Physical well being domain of FACT-HepBaseline then every 3 wkPhase III trial with HRQOL endpoint
Wible et al[44]2010Cohort73Allocated to TACETACESF-36Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 moObservational study with QOL assessment during treatment
Dollinger et al[101]2010Phase III trial135Locally advanced or metastaticThymostimulin (67) vs placebo (68)FACT = HepBaseline then every 3 moPhase III trial with HRQOL endpoint
Chow et al[61]2011Phase III trial204Advanced disease, not eligible for standard therapiesMegestrol acetate (195) vs placebo (69)EORTC QLQ-C30Baseline, then every 1 mo during treatment, then every 3 mo after treatment completedPhase III trial with HRQOL endpoint
Shun et al[102]2012Cohort89Allocated to TACETACESF-12, Symptom Distress Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale3 d before discharge, 1 and 2 moObservational study with QOL assessment during treatment
Qiao et al[103]2012Observational140Any stageNANANAdadsdfsaNAFACT-epHHepBaselineTo describe symptomatology and/or HRQOL of HCC patients - HRQOL worsens with advancing stage
Eltawil et al[45]2012Cohort48Allocated to TACETACEWHOQOL-BREFBaseline then every 3-4 moObservational study with QOL assessment during treatment
Fan et al[104]2012Cross sectional286Any stageEORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-HCC18BaselineTo describe symptomatology and/or HRQOL of HCC patients - HRQOL compared with population norms. Correlation between HRQOL and coping and illness perception
Diouf et al[67]2013Reanalysis of a phase III trial[61]215Not eligible for curative treatment, baseline HRQOL data availableOctreotide vs placeboEORTC QLQ-C30BaselineAs prognostic tools for overall survival - baseline HRQOL was prognostic of overall survival in advanced HCC. HRQOL data may improve existing staging systems
Soliman et al[53]2013Phase II trial21Not eligible for or refractory to standard therapies, symptomaticLiver radiotherapyEORTC QLQ-C30, FACT-Hep, HepCS, TOI, FACT-GBaseline, 1, 3 and 6 moPhase II trial with HRQOL endpoint. Included 20 patients with liver metastasis
Salem et al[41]2013Cohort56Allocated to SIRT or TACESIRT (29), TACE (27)FACT-HepBaseline, 2 and 4 wkObservational study with QOL assessment during treatment
Brunocilla et al[105]2013Cohort36Allocated to sorafenibSorafenibFACT-Hep, FHSI-8, FACT-GBaseline, 1 wk, 1 and 2 moObservational study with QOL assessment during treatment
Johnson et al[62]2013Phase III trial1150Not eligible for resection or local treatment, no prior systemic treatmentBrivanib (577) vs sorafenib (578)Physical function and role function of EORTC QLQ-C30Baseline then every 6 wkPhase III trial with HRQOL endpoint
Meyer et al[63]2013Phase II/III trial86Unresectable, non-metastaticTACE vs TAEEORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-HCC18Baseline, 1.5, 3 and 6 moPhase II trial with HRQOL endpoint
Mise et al[106]2014Cohort69Allocated to resectionResectionSF-36Baseline then every 3 moObservational study with QOL assessment during treatment
Huang et al[38]2014Cohort388Solitary HCC ≤ 3 cmResection, radiofrequency ablationFACT-Hep, HepCS, TOI, FACT-GBaseline, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 moObservational study with QOL assessment during treatment
Zhu et al[64]2014Phase III trial564Progressive disease during or after sorafenibEverolimus (362) vs placebo (184)Global QOL and physical function of EORTC QLQ-C30Baseline, then multiple reassessmentsPhase III trial with HRQOL endpoint
Palmieri et al[107]2015Case control24Any stageNASF-36BaselineTo describe symptomatology and/or HRQOL of HCC patients - evaluates relationship between psychological profile and HRQOL in HCC. Included 22 cirrhotic patients without HCC, 20 control subjects
Chie et al[108]2015Cohort171Allocated to respective treatmentsSurgery (53), ablation (53), TACE (65)EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-HCC18Baseline, then 4-6 wk for post-ablation/post-TACE, 12-15 wk post-operationObservational study with QOL assessment during treatment
Heits et al[109]2015Cross sectional173Allocated to liver transplanationliver transplantationEORTC QLQ-C30At one variable time point post-transplantionTo describe symptomatology and/or HRQOL of HCC patients
Xie et al[110]2015Cohort102Allocated to resection or TACEresection (58), TACE (44)SF-36Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 moObservational study with QOL assessment during treatment
Xing et al[111]2015Cohort118Allocated to TACETACE with doxorubicin eluted beadsSF-36Baseline, 1-3, 6 and 12 moObservational study with QOL assessment during treatment
Kolligs et al[54]2015Randomized phase II trial28Allocated to SIRT or TACESIRT (13), TACE (15)FACT-HepBaseline, then every 6 wkPhase II trial with HRQOL endpoint
Klein et al[42]2015Combined analysis of prior phase I/II trials98Allocated to SBRTSBRTEORTC QL-C30, FACT-HepBaseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 moPhase I/II trial with HRQOL endpoint
Kensinger et al[48]2016Case-control139Allocated to priority liver transplantationLiver transplantationSF-36Baseline, post transplantationObservational study with QOL assessment during treatment - included 362 subjects without HCC
Lei et al[39]2016Cohort205Allocated to resection or transplantationLiver transplantation (110), resection (95)SF-36Baseline, then every 1-2 mo for the first 6 mo, then every 2-3 mo for the next 6 mo, then every 6 moObservational study with QOL assessment during treatment
Yang et al[112]2016Cohort17Portal vein thrombosisTACE and transarterial ethanol ablationEORTC QLQ-C30Baseline then every 1 moObservational study with QOL assessment during treatment
Anota et al[55]2016Phase I trial21Not eligible for curative treatmentTACE with idaurubicin eluted beadsEORTC QLQ-C30Baseline, 15, 30 and 60 dPhase I trial with HRQOL endpoint
Chie et al[88]2016Case-control227Any stageVarious treatmentsEORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-HCC18Baseline, post-treatmentObservational study with QOL assessment during treatment - Compared HRQOL between Asian and European HCC patients
Lv et al[56]2016Randomized phase II trial120Allocated to TACECOX2 inhibitor (60) vs placebo (60)Locally developed questionnaireBaseline, 24 and 48 hPhase II trial with HRQOL endpoint
Koeberle et al[57]2016Randomized phase II trial106Unresectable or metastaticSorafenib + everolimus (60) vs sorafenib (46)FACT-HepCS, EQ-VASBaseline, then every 2 wk until week 12Phase II trial with HRQOL endpoint
Shomura et al[113]2016Cohort54TNM stage IVSorafenibSF-36Baseline, then every 3 moObservational study with QOL assessment during treatment
Bruix et al[14]2016Phase III trial573Progressive disease during sorafenibRegorafenib (379) vs placebo (193)FACT-Hep, TOI, FACT-G, EQ-5D, EQ-VASBaseline, then multiple reassessmentsPhase III trial with HRQOL endpoint
Li et al[69]2017Cohort472Any stageVarious treatmentsEORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-HCC18, C30 index score, HCC18 index scoreBaselineAs prognostic tools for overall survival - baseline HRQOL was prognostic of overall survival in advanced HCC. QOL derived scoring system resembles a staging system