Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Hepatol. Jun 28, 2017; 9(18): 808-814
Published online Jun 28, 2017. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i18.808
Published online Jun 28, 2017. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i18.808
Adverse event | Lammer et al[10] | Wiggermann et al[46] | Song et al[9] | Golfieri et al[35] |
Nausea | Post-embolization syndrome 24.7%/25.9% | Post-embolization syndrome 21.7%/16.3%, P = 0.52 | Post-embolization syndrome 22.2%/20.6%, P = 0.850 | 2.2%/3.4%, P = 0.682 |
Pain | 24.7%/71.6%, P = 0.01 | |||
Fever | 7.9%/11.4%, P = 0.457 | |||
Fatigue | 0%/4.5%, P = 0.059 | |||
Marrow suppression | 5.4%/5.6% | NR | NR | NR |
Cholecystitis | NR | NR | 4.7%/3.3%, P = 0.692 | 2.2%/1.1%, P = 0.999 |
Abscess | NR | 2 | NR | 1.1%/1.1%, P = 0.999 |
Alopecia | 1.1%/20.4% | NR | NR | NR |
Liver function worsening | Significant reduction in DEB1 | NR | AST, 36%/52%, P = 0.259 | 1.1%/5.7%3, P = 0.118 |
ALT, 31%/20%, P = 0.280 | ||||
Hematoma | NR | NR | NR | 1.1%/3.4%, P = 0.368 |
Infection | NR | NR | NR | 0%/1.1%, P = 0.497 |
- Citation: Song JE, Kim DY. Conventional vs drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Hepatol 2017; 9(18): 808-814
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v9/i18/808.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v9.i18.808