Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Hepatol. Jan 8, 2017; 9(1): 57-63
Published online Jan 8, 2017. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i1.57
Table 2 Clinical features of the two subgroups classified according to the effect of ursodeoxycholic acid
Subgroup U11(n = 34)Subgroup U22(n = 14)P
Age (yr)42 (17-74)48 (21-66)ns
Sex (female)33 (97.1%)12 (85.7%)ns
Acute presentation4 (11.8%)1 (7.1%)ns
Laboratory data
AST (IU/L)93 (46-505)144 (50-1234)0.024
ALT (IU/L)124 (52-742)262 (65-1000)0.023
T.Bil (mg/dL)0.7 (0.3-18)1.0 (0.3-2)ns
ALP (U/L)300 (144-1184)300 (168-924)ns
γ-GTP (U/L)86 (16-875)67 (13-405)ns
IgG (mg/dL)1959 (1096-3800)1960 (1476-3793)ns
ANA (≥ 1 : 40)32 (94.1%)14 (100%)ns
SMA (≥ 1 : 40)8/17 (47.1%)3/6 (50%)ns
HLA DR44/11 (36.4%)2/5 (40%)ns
Histological finding
Grading
A124 (70.6%)5 (35.7%)0.025
A210 (29.4%)8 (57.1%)
A30 (0%)1 (7.1%)
Staging
F125 (73.5%)10 (71.4%)ns
F24 (11.8%)2 (14.3%)
F35 (14.7%)1 (7.1%)
F40 (0%)1 (7.1%)
AIH score
Revised score15 (10-19)17 (12-20)ns
Simplified score6 (4-8)6 (6-7)ns