Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Hepatol. Nov 18, 2016; 8(32): 1402-1413
Published online Nov 18, 2016. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i32.1402
Published online Nov 18, 2016. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i32.1402
Parameters | Telbivudine (n = 113) | Tenofovir (n = 117) | Difference between arms and 95%CI |
Patients achieving HBV DNA < 300 copies/mL (51 IU/mL) at week 52, n (%) | |||
± 7 d protocol-prespecified visit window | 104 (91.9) | 111 (95.0) | -3.1% (-9.4%, 3.1%)1 |
Treating missing as failure | 103 (91.0) | 111 (95.0) | -4.0% (-10.5%, 2.5%)1 |
28 d imputation | 105 (92.7) | 111 (95.0) | -2.3% (-8.3%, 3.8%)1 |
Last observation carried forward | 108 (95.4) | 116 (99.2) | -3.8% (-7.9%, 0.4%)1 |
Change from baseline in HBV DNA levels (log10 copies/mL) by visit, mean (SD) | P-value | ||
Week 24 | -4.001 (1.256) | -4.122 (1.165) | P < 0.00012 |
Week 52 | -4.356 (1.473) | -4.305 (1.343) | P < 0.00012 |
Week 104 | -4.281 (1.753) | -4.349 (1.382) | P < 0.00012 |
- Citation: Krastev Z, Petrova D, Kotzev I, Celen MK, Mendelson M, Chandra R, Pandey P, Hamed K. Telbivudine vs tenofovir in hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B patients: OPTIMA roadmap study. World J Hepatol 2016; 8(32): 1402-1413
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v8/i32/1402.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v8.i32.1402