Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Hepatol. Jun 18, 2016; 8(17): 703-715
Published online Jun 18, 2016. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i17.703
Published online Jun 18, 2016. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i17.703
ART (0 to 8 points) | ABCR (-3 to 6 points) | ||
Before the second, the third TACE….. | |||
No radiological response | 1 point | AFP < 200 ng/mL | 0 |
AFP ≥ 200 ng/mL | 1 point | ||
AST increased > 25% | 4 points | BCLC A/B/C | 0/2/3 points |
Child-Pugh increased: 1 point | 1.5 points | Child-Pugh increased ≥ 2 points | 2 points |
Increased: ≥ 2 points | 3 points | Radiological response | -3 points |
No chemoembolization | |||
ART ≥ 2.5 points | ABCR > 2 points |
- Citation: Adhoute X, Penaranda G, Raoul JL, Le Treut P, Bollon E, Hardwigsen J, Castellani P, Perrier H, Bourlière M. Usefulness of staging systems and prognostic scores for hepatocellular carcinoma treatments. World J Hepatol 2016; 8(17): 703-715
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v8/i17/703.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v8.i17.703