Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Hepatol. May 18, 2015; 7(8): 1133-1141
Published online May 18, 2015. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i8.1133
Table 3 Sustained virological response rates for cirrhotic patients who were treated with interferon-free regimens
Ref. (name of trial)Regimen; genotypes; No. of patients (n)Patient characteristicsSVR rates: cirrhosis
vs non-cirrhosis
Kumada et al[27] (AI447026)ASV + DCV; G1; n = 222IFN-intolerant/IFN-ineligible91% vs 87%
IFN-non-response191% vs 79%
Manns et al[28] (HALLMARK-DUAL)ASV + DCV; G1; n = 645Treatment naïve91% vs 89%3
IFN-non-response187% vs 80%
IFN-intolerant/IFN-ineligible79% vs 84%
Lawitz et al[32] (LONESTAR)SOF + LDV ± RBV; G1; n = 40Treatment experienced291% vs 100%34
100% vs 100%5
Osinusi et al[29]SOF + RBV; G1; n = 50Treatment naïve38% vs 65%6
Lawitz et al[26] (FISSION)SOF + RBV; G2-3; n = 256Treatment naïve; 12-wk regimenG2; 83% vs 97%3
G3; 34% vs 61%3
Jacobson et al[30] (POSITRON, FUSION)SOF + RBV; G2-3; n = 408IFN-ineligible/IFN-intolerantG2; 94% vs 92%3
(POSITRON); 12-wk regimenG3; 21% vs 68%3
IFN-failure7 (FUSION)
12-wk regimenG2; 60% vs 96% (90%)
G3; 19% vs 37%
16-wk regimenG2; 78% vs 100% (92%)
G3; 61% vs 63%
Zeuzem et al[31] (VALENCE)SOF + RBV; G2-3; n = 323Treatment-naïve
12-wk regimenG2; 100% vs 97%3
24-wk regimenG3; 92% vs 93%3
Treatment-experienced
12-wk regimenG2; 88% vs 91%
24-wk regimenG3; 60% vs 85%
Lawitz et al[35] (COSMOS)SMV + SOF ± RBV for 12 or 24 wk; G1; n = 167F0-2; non-respondersF0-2; 90%3
F3-4; non-responders or naiveF3-4; 94%
Poordad et al[36] (TURQUOISE-II)Paritaprevir, ritonavir, ombitasvirTreatment-naïve94%38
+ dasabuvir + RBV 12 or 24 wk; G1; n = 380Treatment-experienced
Relapse98%
Partial response96%
Null response91%