Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Hepatol. Oct 18, 2015; 7(23): 2482-2491
Published online Oct 18, 2015. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i23.2482
Table 3 Comparison of different methods
Ref.Year of publicationComparison betweenRemarks
Hochberger et al[75]2006Automated COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan system (real time PCR) and Versant HBV 3.0Good correlation between two
Juman Awadh et al[76]2008Versant HBV 3.0 (Bayer, branched DNA mediated assay) and Biotitre B (real time PCR variant)Both were highly specific, though reproducibility of Versant HBV 3.0 was higher
Yang et al[77]2009Real Art HBV PCR Kit (Abbott, real time PCR) and Versant bDNA 3.0Abbott's kit was more sn, detection limit 27 IU/mL
Louisirirotchanakul et al[78]2010fully automated ElecsysHBsAg II assay, Architect, AxSYM and Advia Centaur HBsAg assaysThe later 2 tests appeared less sensitive in detecting early HBV infection
Berger et al[79]2010CAP/CTM assay v2.0 and v1.0Comparable results for all 278 tested samples
Lunel-Fabiani et al[80]2010Access immunoassay system from Beckman coulter with Abbott AxSYM and PRISM HBsAg assays; VIDAS was used to conclude discrepant resultsSn: 100%, Sp: 99.96%
Caliendo et al[81]2011Abbott RealTime HBV IUO, the Roche CAP/CTM HBV test, the Roche CobasTaqMan HBV test with HighPure system, and the Qiagen artus HBV TM ASRLimit of detection of artus 1.5 log(10) IU/mL, of other 3 tests 1.0 log(10) IU/mL
Ismail et al[82]2011Abbott HBV real-time PCR (Abbott PCR), artus HBV real-time PCR with QIAamp DNA blood kit purification (artus-DB), and artus HBV real-time PCR with the QIAamp DSP virus kit purification (artus-DSP)Lower limit of detection against WHO standards were 1.43, 82 and 9 IU/mL respectively
Yeh et al[83]2014Abbott real time HBV (RealTime assay) and CAP/CTM HBV assays 2.0 (TaqMan assay)Real time assay's Sn: 98.2%, Sp: 100%. Good level of agreement between the two