Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Hepatol. Oct 18, 2015; 7(23): 2482-2491
Published online Oct 18, 2015. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i23.2482
Published online Oct 18, 2015. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i23.2482
Ref. | Year of publication | Sample used | Method used | Comments |
Mendy et al[13] | 2005 | Dried blood spots along with serum | HBsAg detected by determine (TM) HBsAg | Comparison of DBS results with serum testing results: Sn 96%, Sp 100% |
Chen et al[21] | 2005 | Ovarian tissue | HBsAg and HBcAg detected by immunocytochemistry and HBV DNA by PCR | Positivity rate of HBV DNA was 58.3% |
van der Laan et al[17] | 2007 | Hepatocytes | Flow cytometric quantitation | A significant correlation was found between the percentage of infected hepatocytes and the intracellular expression level of HBsAg (R = 0.841, P < 0.001) |
Goh et al[22] | 2008 | Cerumen and otorrhoea samples along with serum | HBsAg and HBeAg were detected by Enzyme Immunoassay and HBV DNA was detected by quantitative PCR | HBV DNA was detected in 66.7% of cerumen samples and 100% of otorrhoea samples |
Chen et al[25] | 2009 | Parotid tissue | Serological markers by immunocytrochemistry and HBV DNA by PCR | Overall positivity rate was 54.5% to 58.3% |
Nuriya et al[18] | 2010 | Hepatocyres | PCR - In situ hybridisation | All hepatocytes were infected with HBV in chronic liver disease |
Villar et al[14] | 2011 | Dried blood spots | HBsAg, anti-HBc, and anti-HBs were detected by ELISA | Sn was 90.5%, 97.6%, and 78% for anti-HBc, HBsAg, anti-HBs assays, and Sp was 92.6%, 96.7%, and 97.3% for anti-HBc, HBsAg, and anti-HBs assays, respectively |
Wu et al[29] | 2012 | Paraffin embedded intrahepatic and extrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma tissue | HBV DNA by nested PCR and HBV related antigens by immunohistochemistry method | HBV DNA and HBV antigens were detected significantly in cases of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma |
Arora et al[24] | 2012 | Saliva | HBsAg was detected by ELISA | Sn 74.29% and Sp 100% |
Cobo et al[27] | 2012 | Spent culture media and liquid nitrogen samples of oocytes and embryos | Reverse transcriptase PCR | Viral sequences were not detected in these samples from seropositive patients |
Ye et al[28] | 2013 | Discarded test tube embryos from mothers with chronic HBV infection undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment | Single cell reverse transcriptase PCR | Detection rate was 13.2% |
Eftekharian et al[23] | 2013 | Cerumen along with serum | HBV DNA was detected by PCR | HBV DNA was detected in 6.6% of HBsAg positive patients |
Kong et al[26] | 2013 | Frozen renal tissue | HBsAg and HBcAg detected by immunohistochemistry | Found positive in 9 out of 500 patients of glomerulonephritis without serological evidence |
Ross et al[15] | 2013 | Dried blood spots | HBsAG, anti HBcAg, anti HBsAg detected by Abbott Architect and HBV DNA by artus HBV LC PCR | Sensitivity was 98.6%, 97.1%, 97.5%, 93% |
Alidjinou et al[16] | 2014 | Dried plasma spots | HBsAg and HBV DNA detected by ELISA and PCR | Sn and Sp 100% for serological markers and Sn 96%, Sp 100% for HBV DNA |
Zhong et al[19] | 2014 | Hepatocytes | Covalently closed circular HBV DNA detected by in situ PCR | Helps to detect recurrence of HBV |
Huang et al[20] | 2015 | Formalin fixed paraffin embedded hepatocellular carcinoma tissue | Droplet digital PCR to detect HBV copy number | Highly sensitive method |
- Citation: Ghosh M, Nandi S, Dutta S, Saha MK. Detection of hepatitis B virus infection: A systematic review. World J Hepatol 2015; 7(23): 2482-2491
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v7/i23/2482.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v7.i23.2482