Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Hepatol. Sep 18, 2015; 7(20): 2274-2291
Published online Sep 18, 2015. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i20.2274
Published online Sep 18, 2015. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i20.2274
Assessment of candidates with HCC for liver transplantation |
When considering treatment options for patients with HCC, the BCLC staging system is the preferred staging system to assess the prognosis of patients with HCC |
The TNM system (7th ed) including pathological examination of the explanted liver, should be used for determining prognosis after transplantation with the addition of assessment of microvascular invasion |
Either dynamic CT or dynamic MRI with the presence of arterial enhancement followed by washout on portal venous or delayed imaging is the best non-invasive test to make a diagnosis in cirrhotic patients suspected of having HCC and for preoperative staging |
Extrahepatic staging should include CT of the chest, and CT or MRI of the abdomen and pelvis |
For patients with lesions smaller or equal to 10 mm, non-invasive imaging does not allow an accurate diagnosis and should not be used to make a decision for or against transplantation |
Criteria for listing candidates with HCC in cirrhotic livers for deceased donor LT |
Preoperative assessment of the size of the largest tumor or total diameter of tumors should be the main consideration in selecting patients with HCC for liver transplantation |
The Milan criteria are currently the benchmark for the selection of HCC patients for liver transplantation, and the basis for comparison with other suggested criteria |
Biomarkers other than α-fetoprotein cannot yet be used for clinical decision making regarding liver transplantation for HCC |
Indication for liver transplantation in HCC should not rely on microvascular invasion because it cannot be reliably detected prior to transplantation |
Role of down-staging |
Liver transplantation after successful down-staging should achieve a 5-yr survival comparable to that of HCC patients who meet the criteria for liver transplantation without requiring down-staging |
Criteria for successful down-staging should include tumour size and number of viable tumours |
Managing patients of the waiting list |
Periodic waiting-list monitoring should be performed by imaging (dynamic CT, dynamic MRI, or contrast-enhanced US) and α-fetoprotein measurements |
Patients found to have progressed beyond criteria acceptable for listing for liver transplantation should be placed on hold and considered for down-staging |
Patients with progressive disease in whom locoregional intervention is not considered appropriate, or is ineffective, should be removed from the waiting list |
Role of living donor LT |
Living donor LT must be restricted to centers of excellence in liver surgery and liver transplantation to minimize donor risk and maximize recipient outcome |
In patients following living donor LT for HCC outside the accepted regional criteria for deceased donor LT, re-transplantation for graft failure using a deceased donor organ is not recommended |
Post-transplant management |
Liver re-transplantation is not appropriate treatment for recurrent HCC |
- Citation: Galun D, Basaric D, Zuvela M, Bulajic P, Bogdanovic A, Bidzic N, Milicevic M. Hepatocellular carcinoma: From clinical practice to evidence-based treatment protocols. World J Hepatol 2015; 7(20): 2274-2291
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v7/i20/2274.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v7.i20.2274