Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Hepatol. Jul 18, 2015; 7(14): 1843-1855
Published online Jul 18, 2015. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i14.1843
Published online Jul 18, 2015. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i14.1843
Trial | Regimen | Duration (wk) | Patient population (patients withcirrhosis in treatment group) | SVR and additionalfindings | SVR for cirrhoticpatients |
NEUTRINO[36] | SOF + peg IFN + RBV | 12 | 327 treatment naïve (54) with G1, 4-6 | 90% overall | 80% |
G1: 292 | 89% | ||||
G4: 28 | 96% | ||||
G5-6: 7 | 100% | ||||
FISSION[36] | SOF + RBV | 12 | 253/499 treatment naïve with G2, G3 (49 cirrhotic) assigned to treatment arm | 67% | 47% |
G2: 70/253 | 97% | 91% | |||
G3: 183/253 | 56% | 34% | |||
POSITRON[37] | SOF + RBV | 12 | 207/278 IFN intolerant or ineligible with G2, G3 (31 cirrhotic) assigned to treatment group | 78% | 61% |
G2: 109 | 93% | 94% | |||
FUSION[37] | SOF + RBV | 12 | G3: 98 | 61% | 21% |
100 treatment experienced with G2, G3 (26) | 50% | 42% | |||
G2: 36 | 86% | 60% | |||
SOF + RBV | 16 | G3: 64 | 30% | 19% | |
95 treatment experienced with G2, G3 (32) | 73% | 66% | |||
G2: 32 | 94% | 78% | |||
VALENCE[38] | SOF + RBV | 12 | G3: 63 | 62% | 61% |
73 patients with G2 (10) | 93% | 90% | |||
Treatment naïve G2: 32 | 97% | 100% | |||
SOF + RBV | 24 | Treatment experienced G2: 41 | 90% | 88% | |
250 patients with G3: (58) | 85% | 67% | |||
Treatment naïve G3: 105 | 93% | 92% | |||
Treatment experienced G3: 145 | 79% | 60% |
- Citation: Khullar V, Firpi RJ. Hepatitis C cirrhosis: New perspectives for diagnosis and treatment. World J Hepatol 2015; 7(14): 1843-1855
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v7/i14/1843.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v7.i14.1843