Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Hepatol. Jul 8, 2015; 7(13): 1742-1754
Published online Jul 8, 2015. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i13.1742
Published online Jul 8, 2015. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i13.1742
Ref. | Country | Study type | Antiviral treatment | No. ofpatients (T/C) | HCCtreatment | Follow-up (T/C),mean/median (yr) | Treatment outcome |
Piao et al[69] | Japan | Retrospective cohort | Lamivudine (100 mg/d) | 30/40 | Resection or ablation/TACE | Not specified | No risk reduction for HCC recurrence |
Better overall survival | |||||||
Shuqun et al[70] | China | Retrospective cohort | Lamivudine (100 mg/d) + thymosin α1 | 17/16 | Resection | 1-3 | Reduced HCC recurrence (NS) |
Kuzuya et al[71] | Japan | Retrospective cohort | Lamivudine (100 mg/d) | 16/33 | Resection or RFA | 3.2/2.7 | No risk reduction |
Kubo et al[72] | Japan | Retrospective cohort | Lamivudine (100 mg/d) | 14/10 | Resection | 2.1 | Higher tumor-free survival |
Yoshida et al[84] | Japan | Retrospective cohort | Lamivudine (100 mg/d) | 33/71 | RFA | 2.8/3.9 | No risk reduction |
Hung et al[85] | China | Retrospective cohort | Lamivudine (100 mg/d) | 10/62 | Resection | 1.6 | Reduced HCC recurrence |
Koda et al[86] | Japan | Retrospective cohort | Lamivudine or entecavir | 30/20 | Resection or ablation/TAE | 2.4/3.0 | No risk reduction for HCC recurrence |
Better overall survival | |||||||
Chuma et al[87] | Japan | Retrospective cohort | Lamivudine (100 mg/d) | 39/64 | Resection or RFA | 2.9/4.4 | Reduced HCC recurrence |
Li et al[74] | China | Prospective cohort | Lamivudine ± adefovir | 43/36 | Resection | 1.0 | No risk reduction |
Chan et al[73] | China | Retrospective cohort | Lamivudine or entecavir | 42/94 | Resection | Not specified | Reduced HCC recurrence |
Urata et al[88] | Japan | Retrospective cohort | Not specified | 46/242 | Resection | 3.1 | Tumor-free survival is better vs patients with high viral load |
Yang et al[89] | China | Prospective cohort | Lamivudine, adefovir or entecavir | 142/188 | Resection | 4.0 | Reduced HCC recurrence |
Wu et al[75] | Taiwan | Retrospective nationwide cohort | Nucleoside analogue(s) | 518/4051 | Resection | 2.6/2.2 | Reduced HCC recurrence |
Huang et al[90] | China | Prospective cohort | Lamivudine, adefovir or entecavir | 865/175 | Resection (HBVDNA > 2000 IU/mL) | 3.5 | Better disease-free survival (borderline significance) |
Better overall survival | |||||||
Huang et al[68] | China | Retrospective cohort | Lamivudine, adefovir or entecavir | 150/1459 | Resection (HBVDNA < 2000 IU/mL) | 2.9-3.3 | Better disease-free survival |
Ke et al[91] | China | Retrospective cohort | Lamivudine (100 mg/d) | 141/337 | Resection | 2.0/1.9 | No risk reduction for HCC recurrence |
Better overall survival | |||||||
Su et al[92] | Taiwan | Retrospective cohort | Lamivudine, entecavir or pegylated interferon | 62/271 | Resection | 3.8 | Reduced HCC recurrence |
Better overall survival | |||||||
Yin et al[76] | China | 2 cohorts (RCT and NRC) | Lamivudine1 (100 mg/d) | RCT: 81/82; NRC: 215/402 | Resection | RCT: 3.3; NRC: 1.98 | Reduced HCC recurrence and better overall survival in both cohorts |
Yeh et al[93] | Taiwan | Retrospective cohort | Entecavir, lamivudine, telbivudine, or combination | 490/3369 | Resection, RFA, PEI | 3.3/3.3 | No benefits for HCC progression or overall survival |
Zhang et al[94] | China | Retrospective cohort | Entecavir (0.5 mg/d) | 40/47 | Resection | 2.6 | Reduced recurrence if HCC ≤ 3 cm |
Hann et al[95] | United States | Retrospective cohort | NAs | 16/9 | Resection, RFA, PEI, TACE | 5.0 | Reduced HCC recurrence |
Better overall survival | |||||||
Nishikawa et al[96] | Japan | Retrospective cohort | Lamivudine, adefovir or entecavir | 99/32 | Resection, RFA, PEI | 3.5/4.0 | No risk reduction for HCC recurrence |
Better overall survival | |||||||
Huang et al[77] | China | RCT | Adefovir (10 mg/d) | 100/100 | Resection | 5.0 | Reduced HCC recurrence |
Switch to entecavir (18 patients) | Better overall survival | ||||||
Chong et al[97] | China | Retrospective-prospective cohort | Nucleoside analog(s) | 254/150 | Resection | 3.3/3.6 | No risk reduction for HCC recurrence |
Better overall survival |
- Citation: Baran B. Nucleos(t)ide analogs in the prevention of hepatitis B virus related hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Hepatol 2015; 7(13): 1742-1754
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v7/i13/1742.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v7.i13.1742