Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Hepatol. Jun 28, 2015; 7(12): 1685-1693
Published online Jun 28, 2015. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i12.1685
Table 3 Comparison of baseline characteristics (effective vs ineffective with tolvaptan)
CharacteristicEffective (n = 38)Ineffective (n = 22)P
Dosing period (d)73 (12-109)22 (7-36)0.02
TLV (mg/d)7.5 (7.5-7.5)7.5 (7.5-7.5)0.36
Age (yr)66.7 ± 11.167.0 ± 11.40.95
Male33 (86.8%)13 (59.1%)0.02
Bodyweight (kg)62 (54-68)60 (48-71)0.58
1Bodyweight (kg)3.6 (2.1-4.7)0.2 (0.1-0.8)< 0.01
HCV antibody positive27 (71.1%)9 (40.9%)0.03
Child-Pugh class C11 (28.9%)16 (72.7%)< 0.01
Refractory ascites35 (92.1%)32 (95.5%)1.00
Hepatic hydrothorax21 (55.3%)11 (50.0%)0.79
Liver neoplasms stage 3, 4a, or 4b11 (28.9%)15 (68.2%)< 0.01
Serum albumin (g/dL)2.9 (2.6-3.2)2.7 (2.3-3.0)0.20
Total bilirubin (mg/dL)1.7 (0.7-1.9)4.5 (1.5-6.3)< 0.01
ALT (IU/L)37 (20-41)50 (25-77)0.18
Serum creatinine (mg/dL)1.53 (0.89-2.09)1.17 (0.95-1.40)0.11
eGFR (mL/min per 1.73 m2)49.8 (26.7-62.7)51.7 (34.6-62.5)0.80
Serum sodium (mEq/L)134 (132-138)131 (128-136)0.03
Platelet count (× 103/μL)107 (58-144)127 (65-190)0.27
Prothrombin activity (%)61.5 (46.3-73.2)53.8 (41.2-64.2)0.10