Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Hepatol. Jun 18, 2015; 7(11): 1494-1508
Published online Jun 18, 2015. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i11.1494
Table 3 Clinical data of prognostic relevant immune modulation by cytomegalovirus immune globulin after liver transplantation
Ref.No. of patients receiving CMVIgEfficacy of CMVIg on immunology/survival
Farges et al[80]n = 19Significant reduction of acute rejection rate (19%) compared to recipients without CMVIg (48%; P = 0.01); no impact of on incidence of chronic rejection and bacterial infections
Falagas et al[121]n = 90Improved 1-yr survival (86% vs 72%; P = 0.029) and a clear trend towards improved long-term survival (68% vs 54%; P = 0.055). CMVIg as independent predictor of beneficial outcome at one year post-LT (P = 0.042)
Bucuvalas et al[124]n = 336Lower rate of acute rejection at 3-mo (31% vs 40%; P = 0.02); (CMV)Ig treatment as independent predictor for absence of acute rejection (HR = 0.73; P = 0.0019); significantly increased death-free allograft survival (HR = 0.57; P = 0.014) by (CMV)Ig
Fisher et al[125]n = 2805Significantly lower risk of graft loss and recipients' death (with or without additional antiviral agents; P < 0.001) at 7 yr post-LT; significantly higher 7-yr-survival rate after CMVIg monoprophylaxis (72%) vs no prophylaxis (67%; P = 0.02)