Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Hepatol. Jun 18, 2015; 7(11): 1494-1508
Published online Jun 18, 2015. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i11.1494
Published online Jun 18, 2015. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i11.1494
Ref. | No. of patients receiving HBIg | Efficacy of HBIg on immunology/survival |
Farges et al[80] | n = 116 | Significant reduction (P < 0.05) of acute and chronic rejection rate (1.7%) compared to other indications like PBC (6.1%), PSC (13%), AIC (17%), and HCV (9.2%), without increased risk of bacterial infection; significantly lower risk (P < 0.05) of death or retransplantation from rejection or either sepsis or de novo malignancy (3.5%) compared to patients with alcoholic cirrhosis (19%) |
Couto et al[81] | n = 12 | Significantly less acute rejection episodes (0.3 ± 0.5) as compared to HBsAg-positive (0.9 ± 0.7; P = 0.02) and HBsAg-naïve (0.7 ± 0.7; P = 0.03) liver transplant patients without HBIg therapy |
Kwekkeboom et al[82] | n = 40 | Sigificantly lower rate of acute rejection (12%) as compared to patients without viral hepatitis (34%; P = 0.012); only HBIg treatment (HR = 0.39, 95%CI: 0.16-0.99, P = 0.047) and year of LT (HR = 0.87, 95%CI: 0.78-0.98, P = 0.017) were identified as independent predictors of acute rejection |
Wang et al[83] | n = 1000 | Reduction of HBV recurrence rate and of viral mutants; significantly improved 1-yr (P = 0.03) and 3-yr survival (P = 0.005) as compared to an antiviral prophylaxis without HBIg |
- Citation: Kornberg A. Intravenous immunoglobulins in liver transplant patients: Perspectives of clinical immune modulation. World J Hepatol 2015; 7(11): 1494-1508
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v7/i11/1494.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v7.i11.1494