Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Hepatol. Jan 27, 2015; 7(1): 113-120
Published online Jan 27, 2015. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i1.113
Table 1 Hepatocellular carcinoma rate of specific mutation combinations and odds ratio in comparison with basal core promoter double mutation only
Specific mutation combinationsHCC1 rateOR95%CIP-value
in combination with BCP2 double mutations
Wild-type3.4% (1/29)0.230.0048-2.06220.2391
BCP double mutations only [(A1762T + G1764A)]313.6% (6/44)13
Dominant quadruple mutations
(G1613A + C1653T)46.2% (6/13)5.42865.4286-1.35300.0200
(C1653T + T1753V)40.0% (2/5)4.22224.2222-0.57970.1821
(C1653T + G1896A)27.3% (6/20)2.71432.7143-0.74950.1680
(T1753V + G1896A)66.7% (14/21)12.666712.6667-3.62620.0000
(A1846T + G1896A)46.2% (6/13)5.42865.4286-1.35300.0200
Dominant combinations in sextuplet mutations:
(G1613A + C1653T + A1846T + G1896A)71.4% (5/7)14.51421.8869-185.13590.0033
(G1613A + C1653T + A1846T + G1899A)83.3% (5/6)28.25552.5885-1517.96730.0012
Dominant combinations in septuplet mutations:
(G1613A + C1653T + T1753V + A1846T + G1896A)100% (6/6)Infinity5.4236-infinity0.0001
(G1613A + C1653T + A1846T + G1896A + G1899A)85.7% (6/7)39.35534.0487-2018.04330.0001