Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Hepatol. Dec 27, 2014; 6(12): 916-922
Published online Dec 27, 2014. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v6.i12.916
Published online Dec 27, 2014. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v6.i12.916
Technique | Advantages | Disadvantages |
NASBA | Specifically designed to detect RNA and in turn RNA viruses | Denaturation step |
Power saving (41 °C) | Less efficient in Amplifying RNA targets out of the range 120-250 bp | |
LAMP | Highly specific (utilizes 4-6 primers spanning 6-8 distinct sequences) | Primer design is complex |
Tolerance to biological substances | Unable to perform multiplex amplification | |
Could be detected by a cheap turbidity-meter | ||
SDA | Power saving (37 °C) | Sample prep. needed |
Nuclease selection is complex | ||
Inefficient in long target sequences | ||
RCA | Power saving (37 °C) | Primer is complex |
Specific enough to allow SNP analysis | RNA amplification is complex | |
Works only with a circular nucleic acid template | ||
HDA | Simple primer design | Expensive enzymes |
Robust to biological substances | ||
No initial heating step | ||
RPA | Power saving (37 °C) | |
Simple primer design | ||
Extremely quick (20 min) | ||
No initial heating step | ||
Robust to biological substances |
- Citation: Zaghloul H, El-shahat M. Recombinase polymerase amplification as a promising tool in hepatitis C virus diagnosis. World J Hepatol 2014; 6(12): 916-922
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v6/i12/916.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v6.i12.916