Review
Copyright ©2010 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Hepatol. Oct 27, 2010; 2(10): 374-383
Published online Oct 27, 2010. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v2.i10.374
Table 4 Panel markers for fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
IndexAuthor (Nation)PaperParameterPatient selectionNStageAUROC
Angulo P (USA)Hepatology 1999Obesity1, age, AST/ALT ratio, DMNASH144F0-2 vs F3-4
BAATRatziu V (France)Gastroenterology 2000BMI, age, ALT, TGPatients with BMI>25, raised transaminse93F0-1 vs F2-40.840
FibroTest (FT)Ratziu V (France)BMC Gastroenterol 2006Age, sex, α2-macroglobulin, , apolipoprotein A1, haptoglobin, T-Bil, γGTBiopsy proven NAFLD267F0-2 vs F3-40.840
N scoreMiyaaki H (Japan)Liver Int 2008Female, age, DM, HTBiopsy proven NAFLD182F0-2 vs F3-40.780
NAFLD fibrosis scoreAngulo P (USA, UK, Australia, Italy)Hepatology 2007Age, BMI, AST/ALT ratio, IFG/DM, platelet count, albuminBiopsy proven NAFLD4802F0-2 vs F3-40.8802
25330.8203
ELF panelGuha IN (UK)Hepatology 2008TIMP1, HA, P3NPBiopsy proven NAFLD192F0 vs F1-40.820
F0-1 vs F2-40.900
F0-2 vs F3-40.930
BARD scoreHarrison SA (USA)Gut 2008BMI, AST/ALT, DMBiopsy proven NAFLD827F0-2 vs F3-40.8102
0.7803
FIB4 indexShah (USA)Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009Age, AST, ALT, PLTBiopsy proven NAFLD541F0-2 vs F3-40.802
FibroMeterCalès (France)J Hepatol 2009Glucose , AST, ferritin, PLT, ALT, BW, ageBiopsy proven NAFLD235F0-1 vs F2-40.9362
0.9523
PAFHossain (USA)Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009Male , Caucasian, DM, ALT, ASTBiopsy proven NAFLD432F0-1 vs F2-40.742