Copyright
©2010 Baishideng.
World J Hepatol. Jan 27, 2010; 2(1): 8-15
Published online Jan 27, 2010. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v2.i1.8
Published online Jan 27, 2010. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v2.i1.8
Study | n | Study group1 | Type of CT | Analysis | Gold standard | Sensitivity | Statistic | |
CEUS | CT | |||||||
Quaia et al[31], 2006 | 253 | K or S | 1-slice CT | P-by-P3 | CT, FNA, Follow-up, MRI, IOUS | 0.83 | 0.89 | NS2 |
Larsen et al[34] , 2007 | 365 | S | 4-slice CT | P-by-P | CT, IOUS, CEUS, FNA, surgery resection, follow-up | 0.8 | 0.89 | NS |
Dietrich et al[32] | 131 | UK | Multislice CT in most cases4 | P-by-P | CT, MRI, FNA, follow up | 0.91 | 0.89 | NS |
Piscaglia et al[33], 2007 | 109 | S | 1-or 4-slice CT | P-by-P | CT, US, FNA, Follow-up | 0.95 | 0.91 | NS |
Janica et al[40], 2007 | 51 | K or S | Not described | L-by-L5 | FNA, surgical resection, CT and follow-up | 0.9 | 0.78 | NS |
Konopke et al[39], 2005 | 56 | S or K | 1-, 4- or 16-slice CT | P-by-P | IOUS, FNA, CT | 0.86 | 0.76 | NS |
- Citation: Larsen LPS. Role of contrast enhanced ultrasonography in the assessment of hepatic metastases: A review. World J Hepatol 2010; 2(1): 8-15
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v2/i1/8.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v2.i1.8