Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Hepatol. Mar 27, 2025; 17(3): 104534
Published online Mar 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i3.104534
Published online Mar 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i3.104534
Table 2 Test performance according to statistical methods by features
Features and test | Obuchowski weighted AUROC mean (standard error) | Standard binary AUROC mean (95%CI) | ||
Fibrosis | 5 stages, 10 comparisons | F2, F3, F4 vs F0, F1 | F3, F4 vs F0, F1, F2 | F4 vs F0, F1, F2, F3 |
FibroTest | 0.919 (0.014) | 0.83 (0.73-0.90) | 0.83 (0.73-0.90) | 0.80 (0.68-0.88) |
VCTE | 0.933 (0.014) | 0.86 (0.77-0.92) | 0.87 (0.78-0.93) | 0.87 (0.78-0.94) |
FIB-4 | 0.882 (0.019) | 0.71 (0.60-0.80) | 0.75 (0.63-0.83) | 0.80 (0.67-0.89) |
Activity | 4 stages, 8 comparisons | A2, A3 vs A0, A1 | - | - |
ActiTest | 0.921 (0.016) | 0.86 (0.76-0.92) | - | - |
ALT | 0.905 (0.019) | 0.83 (0.73-0.90) | - | - |
- Citation: Peta V, Sandler Y, Deckmyn O, Duroselle O, Vinnitskaya E, Khomeriki S, Noskova K, Poynard T. Diagnostic performance of FibroTest-ActiTest, transient elastography, and the fibrosis-4 index in patients with autoimmune hepatitis using histological reference. World J Hepatol 2025; 17(3): 104534
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v17/i3/104534.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v17.i3.104534