Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Hepatol. Feb 27, 2025; 17(2): 100033
Published online Feb 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i2.100033
Published online Feb 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i2.100033
Table 8 Vibration-controlled transient elastography diagnostic efficacy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for fibrosis detection)
Ref. | Number of patients | Disease/diagnose | Diagnostic method | Fibrosis stage | AUROC (CI) | Assessment |
Cassinotto et al[23] | 577 | NAFLD | VCTE | F ≥ 2 | 0.80 (0.76-0.84) | Acceptable |
F ≥ 3 | 0.82 (0.78-0.86) | Good | ||||
F4 | 0.85 (0.80-0.90) | Good | ||||
Gatos et al[27] | 152 | CLD | VCTE | F ≥ F1 | 0.9900 | Excellent |
F ≥ F2 | 0.9767 | Excellent | ||||
F ≥ F3 | 0.9651 | Excellent | ||||
F = F4 | 0.9645 | Excellent | ||||
Imajo et al[66] | 231 | NAFLD | VCTE | F4 | 0.87 (0.80-0.91) | Good |
Nogami et al[36] | 163 | NAFLD | VCTE | ≥ F2 | 0.855 (0.83-0.94) | Good |
≥ F3 | 0.925 (0.90-0.95) | Excellent | ||||
F4 | 0.88 (0.87-0.89) | Good | ||||
Sharpton et al[43] | 114 | CLD | VCTE | F2-F4 | 0.86 (0.80-0.93) | Good |
F3-F4 | 0.91 (0.82-0.99) | Excellent | ||||
F4 | 0.96 (0.91-1.00) | Excellent | ||||
Atzori et al[22] | 160 | CLD | VCTE | F0/1 | 0.810 (0.746-0.884) | Good |
F3/4 | 0.841 (0.771-0.910) | Good | ||||
F4 | 0.939 (0.896-0.982) | Excellent | ||||
Damjanovska et al[24] | 93 | NAFLD | VCTE | F4 | 0.77 (0.66-0.88) | Acceptable |
Mikolasevic et al[35] | 179 | NAFLD | VCTE | ≥ F3 | 0.98 | Excellent |
F4 | 0.98 | Excellent | ||||
Roccarina et al[40] | 671 | NAFLD | VCTE | F > 1 | 0.792 (0.60-0.91) | Acceptable |
F > 2 | 0.849 (0.78-0.91) | Good | ||||
F > 3 | 0.851 (0.79-0.91) | Good | ||||
F = 4 | 0.911 (0.83-0.96) | Excellent | ||||
Zougmoréet al[55] | 476 | CLD | VCTE | ≥ F2 | 0.86 (0.81-0.91) | Good |
≥ F3 | 0.89 (0.85-0.93) | Good | ||||
≥ F4 | 0.90 (0.86-0.94) | Good |
- Citation: Pozowski P, Bilski M, Bedrylo M, Sitny P, Zaleska-Dorobisz U. Modern ultrasound techniques for diagnosing liver steatosis and fibrosis: A systematic review with a focus on biopsy comparison. World J Hepatol 2025; 17(2): 100033
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v17/i2/100033.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v17.i2.100033