Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Hepatol. Feb 27, 2025; 17(2): 100033
Published online Feb 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i2.100033
Published online Feb 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i2.100033
Table 7 Transient elastography diagnostic efficacy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for fibrosis detection)
Ref. | Number of patients | Disease/diagnose | Diagnostic method | Fibrosis stage | AUROC (CI) | Assessment |
Mendoza et al[34] | 200 | NAFLD | TE | ≥ F2 | 0.76 (0.64-0.88) | Acceptable |
≥ F3 | 0.72 (0.63-0.82) | Acceptable | ||||
F4 | 0.89 (0.78-1.00) | Good | ||||
Patidar et al[39] | 127 | Diffuse liver diseases | TE | F0-F1 | 0.824 (0.72-1) | Good |
F1-F2 | 0.935 (0.906-1) | Good | ||||
F2-F3 | 0.964 (0.883-1) | Good | ||||
F3-F4 | 0.979 (0.633-1) | Good | ||||
Seyrek et al[42] | 146 | CLD | TE | > F2 | 0.79 (0.65-0.94) | Acceptable |
Taibbi et al[46] | 56 | NAFLD | TE | F2-F4 | 0.719 (0.572-0.867) | Acceptable |
F3-F4 | 0.799 (0.646-0.952) | Acceptable | ||||
Yoo et al[52] | 115 | CLD | TE | F2 | 0.859 (0.781-0.916) | Good |
F3 | 0.881 (0.807-0.934) | Good | ||||
F4 | 0.938 (0.877-0.974) | Excellent | ||||
Kim et al[67] | 60 | NASH | TE | ≥ F1 | 0.733 (0.603-0.839) | Acceptable |
≥ F2 | 0.828 (0.709-0.913) | Good | ||||
≥ F3 | 0.869 (0.756-0.942) | Good | ||||
≥ F4 | 0.891 (0.783-0.957) | Good |
- Citation: Pozowski P, Bilski M, Bedrylo M, Sitny P, Zaleska-Dorobisz U. Modern ultrasound techniques for diagnosing liver steatosis and fibrosis: A systematic review with a focus on biopsy comparison. World J Hepatol 2025; 17(2): 100033
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v17/i2/100033.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v17.i2.100033