Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Hepatol. Aug 27, 2024; 16(8): 1131-1144
Published online Aug 27, 2024. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v16.i8.1131
Table 5 Univariable Cox proportional hazard regression survival analysis
OS
RFS
Variable
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
Age (years), ≥ 49 vs < 491.06 (0.77-1.47)0.721.01 (0.71-1.44)0.97
Gender, male vs female0.93 (0.64-1.35)0.680.89 (0.59-1.32)0.55
Race, Han vs others0.95 (0.69-1.31)0.760.80 (0.58-1.32)0.27
Smoking, yes vs no0.70 (0.48-1.03)0.070.57 (0.36-0.89)0.01
Drinking, yes vs no0.74 (0.51-1.07)0.110.63 (0.41-0.96)0.03
HBV, positive vs negative1.22 (0.86-1.74)0.271.48 (0.99-2.19)0.05
HCV, positive vs negative0.85 (0.56-1.30)0.460.97 (0.62-1.50)0.89
AFP, positive vs negative2.93 (2.03-4.24)1.18 × 10-82.63 (1.75-3.95)3.04 × 10-6
AFB1 exposure, high vs low3.00 (2.06-4.36)8.43 × 10-93.41 (2.25-5.18)8.67 × 10-9
Tumor size (cm), > 5 vs ≤ 52.70 (1.85-3.93)2.63 × 10-72.50 (1.65-3.77)1.37 × 10-5
ES grade, III-IV vs I-II1.79 (1.29-2.49)5.55 × 10-41.60 (0.79-2.30)0.01
TNM stage, II vs I1.57 (0.97-2.53)0.061.35 (0.79-2.30)0.27
TNM stage, III vs I5.95 (3.56-9.94)1.01 × 10-114.29 (2.48-7.41)1.92 × 10-7
Liver cirrhosis, yes vs no1.02 (0.72-1.44)0.931.17 (0.79-1.74)0.43
MVD, high vs low2.87 (2.06-4.02)6.84 × 10-103.40 (2.34-4.96)1.82 × 10-10
PVTT, positive vs negative2.30 (1.62-3.28)4.06 × 10-62.43 (1.68-3.53)2.95 × 10-6
MVI, positive vs negative2.48 (1.75-3.50)2.56 × 10-72.53 (1.76-3.64)5.63 × 10-7
TIMP3, LTE vs HTE2.92 (2.19-4.09)4.10 × 10-102.34 (1.63-3.38)4.80 × 10-6