Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Hepatol. Nov 27, 2024; 16(11): 1265-1281
Published online Nov 27, 2024. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v16.i11.1265
Published online Nov 27, 2024. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v16.i11.1265
Table 9 Performance of automated and manual cell count methods in cases having both methods performed in cohort 2, n (%)
| | Automated method | Total | |
| Positive | Negative | ||
| Positive-SBP cases | |||
| Manual method | |||
| Positive | 13 | 0 | 13 (52) |
| Negative | 7 | 5 | 12 |
| Total | 20 (80) | 5 | 25 |
| Negative-SBP cases | |||
| Manual method | |||
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Negative | 2 | 47 | 49 (100) |
| Total | 0 | 47 (96) | 49 |
- Citation: Acevedo-Haro JG, Mohamed W, Moodley P, Bendall O, Bennett K, Keelty N, Chan S, Waddy S, Hosking J, Thomas W, Tilley R. Sensitivity of diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is higher with the automated cell count method. World J Hepatol 2024; 16(11): 1265-1281
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v16/i11/1265.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v16.i11.1265