Sensitivity of diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is higher with the automated cell count method

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 16, Issue 11

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

HTML

Figures (1-6)

Tables (1-11)

Sum=13

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

Download

Sum=0

Nov 27, 2024 (publication date) through Nov 6, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Hepatology

ISSN

1948-5182

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Cohort Study

World J Hepatol. Nov 27, 2024; 16(11): 1265-1281
Published online Nov 27, 2024. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v16.i11.1265

Table 5 Performance of automated and manual cell count methods in cohort 1, n (%)

SBP: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

Citation: Acevedo-Haro JG, Mohamed W, Moodley P, Bendall O, Bennett K, Keelty N, Chan S, Waddy S, Hosking J, Thomas W, Tilley R. Sensitivity of diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is higher with the automated cell count method. World J Hepatol 2024; 16(11): 1265-1281
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v16/i11/1265.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v16.i11.1265