Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Hepatol. Nov 27, 2024; 16(11): 1265-1281
Published online Nov 27, 2024. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v16.i11.1265
Published online Nov 27, 2024. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v16.i11.1265
Automated method | Total | |||||
Positive | Negative | |||||
Positive-SBP cases | ||||||
Manual method | ||||||
Positive | 14 | 0 | 14 (56) | |||
Negative | 6 | 5 | 11 | |||
Total | 20 (80) | 5 | 25 | |||
Negative-SBP cases | ||||||
Manual method | ||||||
Positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Negative | 2 | 47 | 49 (100) | |||
Total | 2 | 47 (96) | 49 |
- Citation: Acevedo-Haro JG, Mohamed W, Moodley P, Bendall O, Bennett K, Keelty N, Chan S, Waddy S, Hosking J, Thomas W, Tilley R. Sensitivity of diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is higher with the automated cell count method. World J Hepatol 2024; 16(11): 1265-1281
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v16/i11/1265.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v16.i11.1265