Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Hepatol. Sep 27, 2023; 15(9): 1060-1083
Published online Sep 27, 2023. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v15.i9.1060
Table 3 GRADE assessment of evidence certainty (quality) for every endpoint
Endpoint
Risk of bias
Imprecision
Inconsistency
Indirectness
Publication bias
Effect size
Quality
Cirrhosis effect (patients vs controls) on QTcNo important risk of biasNo important imprecisionNo important inconsistencyNo important indirectnessNo important publication biasVery largeVery high
QTc prolongation in cirrhosis (QTc vs 440 ms)No important risk of biasNo important imprecisionNo important inconsistencyNo important indirectnessNo important publication biasVery largeVery high
Sex effect on QTc in cirrhosisNo important risk of biasNo important imprecisionSerious inconsistencyNo important indirectnessNo important publication biasTrivialVery low
Etiology of cirrhosis (alcohol vs viral) effect on QTcNo important risk of biasNo important imprecisionSerious inconsistencyNo important indirectnessNo important publication biasTrivialVery low
Child-Pugh stage (C vs B vs A) effect on QTcNo important risk of biasNo important imprecisionNo important inconsistencyNo important indirectnessNo important publication biasMedium with dose-response gradientHigh
MELD score effect on QTc prolongationNo important risk of biasNo important imprecisionNo important inconsistencyNo important indirectnessNo important publication biasMediumLow
β-blockers effect on QTcNo important risk of biasNo important imprecisionNo important inconsistencyNo important indirectnessNo important publication biasMediumLow
Acute gastrointestinal bleeding effect on QTcNo important risk of biasNo important imprecisionSerious inconsistencyNo important indirectnessNo important publication biasVery largeHigh
Liver transplantation effect on QTcNo important risk of biasNo important imprecisionNo important inconsistencyNo important indirectnessNo important publication biasLargeHigh
QTc prolongation effect on overall survival in cirrhosisNo important risk of biasNo important imprecisionNo important inconsistencyNo important indirectnessNo important publication biasMediumLow