Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Hepatol. Jul 27, 2023; 15(7): 925-938
Published online Jul 27, 2023. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v15.i7.925
Table 2 Summary of study findings
Ref.
Location
Sample characteristics
Study design
IBS diagnosis
NAFLD diagnosis
IBS and NAFLD overlap
Associated risk factors
Ke et al[20], 2013 ChinaNo. of patients: 945. NAFLD population: 470 (226 males, 222 females). Total without NAFLD: 475 (198 males, 234 females). Note: DM was in exclusion criteriaCross-sectional studyROME IIIUltrasound; Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association diagnosis criteria for NAFLDIBS incidence: 104 (23.2%) of NAFLD patients vs 54 (12.5%) of patients without NAFLD. NAFLD incidence in patients with IBS symptoms: 65.8% of patients with IBS-like symptoms had NAFLD. Higher detection rate of IBS-like symptoms with more severe NAFLD (P < 0.05). Mild NAFLD (Group A): 24 out of 212 (11.3%). Moderate NAFLD (Group B): 52 out of 188 (27.7%). Severe NAFLD (Group C): 28 out of 48 (58.3%)Risk factors for IBS-like symptoms: BMI (P = 0.049). Triglycerides (P = 0.034). Fatty liver (P = 0.047). Ethnicity-Han, Uygur (P = 0.008)
Hasanian et al[21], 2018 Egypt100 consecutive patients diagnosed with IBS (49 males, 51 females): 45% IBS-C 23% IBS-D 32% IBS-M. Further divided into: Mild IBS (n = 42); Moderate IBS (n = 43); Severe IBS (n = 15)Cross-sectional study ROME IIIUltrasound74% of IBS patients had NAFLD. Moderate/severe NAFLD significantly associated with moderate/severe IBS. 22.4% moderate/severe IBS patients (95%CI: 15.8%-31.5%) vs 4.8% mild IBS patients: (95%CI: 2.7%-7.9%) (P = 0.001) Predictors of moderate/severe IBS: NAFLD (P = 0.026); Metabolic Syndrome (P = 0.011)
Zheng et al[22], 2011 ChinaNo. of patients: 200 (89 males, 111 females) (1) Both NAFLD and IBS: 25; (2) Either NAFLD or IBS: 36; and (3) Neither IBS nor NAFLD: 139Cross-sectional study ROME IIIUltrasound; NAFLD diagnosis based on Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association 25 subjects (12.5%) had both NAFLD and IBSNAFLD and IBS overlap group compared to group without NAFLD and IBS Overlap had higher: BMI (P = 0.045); TG (P = 0.035); TC (P = 0.038); HDL-C (P = 0.045); LDL-C (P = 0.031); FBG (P = 0.023). NAFLD and IBS overlap group compared to the either NAFLD or IBS group had higher: Hypertension (P = 0.041); Obesity (P = 0.034); Dyslipidemia (P = 0.020); Diabetes (P = 0.037); Digestive system diseases (P = 0.037). GIT sensory threshold: NAFLD and IBS overlap group had lower threshold of the following compared to either NAFLD or IBS group: FSV (P = 0.034); DSV (P = 0.032); MTV (P = 0.035); PSV (P = 0.027)
Franco et al[23], 2022 United States No. of patients: 130 patients with NAFLD (49 males, 81 females)Cross-sectional studyROME IVICD-10 Code38 (29.2%) patients with NAFLD fulfilled Rome IV IBS criteria Increased prevalence of depression (18.4% vs 5.4%, P = 0.01) and anxiety (31.6% vs 9.8%, P = 0.002) in NAFLD patients with IBS compared to those without IBS. Independent predictors of IBS in NAFLD: Female gender (OR: 5.69, P = 0.001); Depression (OR: 1.23, P < 0.001); BMI (OR: 0.90, P = 0.02)
Wu et al[24], 2022 United Kingdom No. of patients: 396838 (189759 males, 207079 females). NAFLD population: 153203Prospective cohort study; United Kingdom Biobank ICD-10 CodeFatty Liver Index 7129 cases of incident IBS in NAFLD patients (cumulative incidence rate of 1.49 (95%CI: 1.46–1.53) per 1000 person-years). NAFLD patients showed a 13% higher risk of developing IBS (HR = 1.13, 1.05-1.17). Increased risk of IBS in higher FLI quartile Subgroup analysis showed increased IBS risk for: Age (P < 0.003); Gender (Female) (P < 0.001)
Singh et al[25], 2013 India No. of patients: 632 patients with incidentally detected NAFLD (484 males, 148 females)Retrospective analysis Not documentedUltrasound diagnosis and grading of liver steatosis by two radiologists in a blinded study186 (29.4%) out of 632 NAFLD patients had IBS-