Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Hepatol. Jun 27, 2023; 15(6): 775-785
Published online Jun 27, 2023. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v15.i6.775
Published online Jun 27, 2023. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v15.i6.775
Ref. | Tumor | Tumor budding criteria |
Kairaluoma et al[75] | HCC | Evaluation was performed according to median values; Negative: No buds were found; Positive: At least one bud was present |
Wei et al[76] | HCC | Association between TB and clinicopathological parameters; Grade 1 (0-4), Grade 2 (5-9), Grade 3 (≥ 10); For survival analysis; Low grade (0-9), High grade (≥ 10) |
Okubo et al[77] | CCC | Negative: < 5 budding focus; Positive: ≥ 5 budding focus |
Ogino et al[78] | EHCC-PH, EHCC-DC | Cut-off values of TB obtained by recursive partioning technique; For EHCC-PH; Low grade (0-4), Intermediate grade (5-11), High grade (≥ 12); For EHCC-DC; Low grade (0-4), High grade (≥ 5) |
Tanaka et al[80] | ICC, EHCC-PH, EHCC-DC | Low grade (0-4), Intermediate grade (5-9), High grade (≥10) |
Ito et al[81] | EHCC-PH | Low TB: < 5 budding focus; High TB: ≥ 5 budding focus |
Agostini-Vulaj et al[83] | ICC, EHCC | Grade 1 (0-4), Grade 2 (5-9), Grade 3 (≥ 10) |
Budau et al[84] | ICC | Grade 1 (0-4), Grade 2 (5-9), Grade 3 (≥ 10) |
Kosaka et al[85] | ICC | Low grade (0-4), Intermediate grade (5-9), High grade (≥ 10) |
Nakayama et al[82] | EHCC-DC | Low TB (0-4), High [TB Grade 2 (5-9) and 3 (≥ 10)] |
- Citation: Unal B, Celik MY, Gedik EO, Bassorgun CI, Elpek GO. Tumor budding as a potential prognostic marker in determining the behavior of primary liver cancers. World J Hepatol 2023; 15(6): 775-785
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v15/i6/775.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v15.i6.775