Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Hepatol. Jul 27, 2022; 14(7): 1291-1306
Published online Jul 27, 2022. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i7.1291
Published online Jul 27, 2022. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i7.1291
Condition | Antidiabetic drug with pros and cons | Preferences |
Obesity | Metformin, SGLT2i, and GLP-1 agonists promote weight loss; DPP-4 inhibitors are weight neutral; Sulfonylureas, Pioglitazone, and Insulin promote weight gain | Should be preferred; May be considered; Consider alternative |
Sarcopenia | Metformin and TZD appears to have favorable effect on muscles mass; SGLT2 inhibitors, SUs (especially glibenclamide and glinides) may increase the risk of sarcopenia | Should be preferred; Consider alternative |
Hyperammonemia/Recurrent HE | Metformin and AGIs cause reduction of blood ammonia levels and risk of HE | May be preferred |
Renal impairment | Insulin and linagliptin appear to be safe; SGLT-2 inhibitors may be considered with dose modification. It has added diuretic advantage; Metformin increases the risk of lactic acidosis | Should be preferred; May be considered; Should be avoided |
Hypoglycemia | Insulin in SU have high risk of hypoglycaemia; Metformin, PZD, DPP4i and SGLT2 inhibitors have low risk of hypoglycaemia | Should be avoided; May be considered |
LC with dysplastic liver lesion/high serum AFP | Metformin decreases the risk of HCC; DPP4 inhibitors and pioglitazone inhibit HCC development in experimental model; Insulin increases risk of HCC | Should be preferred; May be consider; Should be avoided |
- Citation: Kumar R, García-Compeán D, Maji T. Hepatogenous diabetes: Knowledge, evidence, and skepticism. World J Hepatol 2022; 14(7): 1291-1306
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v14/i7/1291.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v14.i7.1291