Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Hepatol. May 27, 2022; 14(5): 992-1005
Published online May 27, 2022. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i5.992
Table 3 Baseline characteristics of patients and treatment (recurrent biliary obstruction group vs non-recurrent biliary obstruction group)


RBO group (n = 18)
Non-RBO group (n = 69)
P value
Age (IQR, yr)66.5 (61-77)69 (63.5-77)0.63
Sex, n (%) Female5 (27.8)27 (39.1)0.42
Male13 (72.2)42 (60.9)
ASA-PS, n (%) 12 (11.1)22 (31.9)0.07
29 (50.0)35 (50.7)
37 (38.9)12 (17.4)
Primary disease, n (%)Other cancers8 (44.4)21 (30.4)0.28
Pancreatic cancer10 (55.6)48 (69.6)
Clinical stage, n (%) II1 (5.6)2 (2.9)0.08
III4 (22.2)4 (5.8)
IV13 (72.2)63 (89.9)
Chemotherapy, n (%) No8 (44.4)31 (44.9)1.00
Yes10 (55.6)38 (55.1)
Radiotherapy, n (%) No17 (94.4)59 (85.5)0.45
Yes1 (5.6)10 (14.5)
Total bilirubin level (continuous, mg/dL)2.7 (1.1-6.7)4.4 (2.3-9.0)0.07
Length of stricture (IQR, mm)34.9 (25.9-47.2)30.9 (21.4-37.8)0.13
Total procedure time (IQR, min)35.5 (25-50.8)32.0 (24-47)0.65
EST, n (%) No5 (27.8)22 (31.9)1.00
Yes13 (72.2)47 (68.1)
CSEMS type (1), n (%) Partially9 (50.0)29 (42.0)0.60
Fully9 (50.0)40 (58.0)
CSEMS type (2), n (%) Laser-cut1 (5.6)5 (7.2)1.00
Braided17 (94.4)64 (92.8)
Length of CSEMS, n (%) ≤ 6 cm8 (44.4)40 (58.0)0.55
7 cm3 (16.7)7 (10.2)
8 cm7 (38.9)22 (31.9)
Diameter of CSEMS, n (%) 6 mm0 (0.0)3 (4.4)0.58
8 mm1 (5.6)2 (2.9)
10 mm17 (94.4)64 (92.8)
Angle of CSEMS (IQR, °)135.5 (114.8-149.3)149.0 (138.5-158)0.01

  • Citation: Tanoue K, Maruyama H, Ishikawa-Kakiya Y, Kinoshita Y, Hayashi K, Yamamura M, Ominami M, Nadatani Y, Fukunaga S, Otani K, Hosomi S, Tanaka F, Kamata N, Nagami Y, Taira K, Watanabe T, Fujiwara Y. Angle of covered self-expandable metallic stents after placement is a risk factor for recurrent biliary obstruction. World J Hepatol 2022; 14(5): 992-1005
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v14/i5/992.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v14.i5.992