Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Hepatol. May 27, 2022; 14(5): 866-884
Published online May 27, 2022. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i5.866
Table 1 Methods to detect covalently closed circular DNA
Method
Advantages
Disadvantages
Ref.
Blotting
Southern blotSpecific detection of DNA sequences; Able to distinguish cccDNA from other viral DNA species; Reliable and reproducibleComplicated, time-consuming, and costly[101-102]
PCR-based methods
Conventional qPCRSimple, accurate, and sensitive; Suitable for high-throughput screening; Rapid and economicalSpecificity is reduced if high concentration of rcDNA is present[100,102]
Semi-nested and nested qPCRSensitive and specific; Allows for cccDNA quantification [100,102,104,106]
Competitive qPCRSensitive; Can readily distinguish cccDNA from rcDNA; Allows for cccDNA quantification [100,102,107]
Droplet-digital PCRVery sensitive and accurate; Can detect a single copy of cccDNA precisely; Allows for cccDNA quantification [102,108-114]
Rolling circle amplification qPCRVery sensitive; cccDNA is visible at single-cell resolutionEffective amplification may be hindered by cross-linked proteins or diffusion of DNA[100,102,115-117]
Magnetic capture hybridization PCRSensitive and specific; Allows for selective isolation of cccDNA; ReproducibleUnable to capture all cccDNA completely; Complicated and costly[100,102,118-119]
Invader AssaySpecific, simple, and reproducible[100,102,121-124]
In situ hybridizationSpecific; Can distinguish different types of nucleic acids; Visible at single-cell resolutionComplicated probe design[100,102,125-126]
Indirect method
Surrogate markersNon-invasive; Convenient and cost-effective; Suitable for high-throughput screeningIndirect [100,114,126-128,131-135]