Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Hepatol. Apr 27, 2022; 14(4): 696-707
Published online Apr 27, 2022. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i4.696
Table 2 Major advantages and limitations of noninvasive periportal fibrosis markers in Schistosomiasis mansoni infected patients
PFF markers
Advantages
Limitations
Direct markers
PICPElevated levels in patients not treated yet with praziquantel and related to the stage of fibrosis and necroinflammationNot reliable for establishing fibrosis grade
P3NPUse for complicated patients who developed hypertension and with more severe liver diseasesLow sensitivity in mild cases
Serum type VI collagenCorrelated with liver fibrosis, splenomegaly, portal vein dilatation and the presence of portosystemic collateralsLow sensitivity
Hyaluronic acidMarker for the initial phase of liver fibrosis and it is able to assess the severity of liver diseaseHigh levels in different etiologies of liver disease, barely accessible
Indirect markers
APRILow cost, good sensitivity, high diagnostic accuracy for cirrhosisInterference of hepatic comorbidities
Blood platelet countLow cost and sensitive marker. It is a marker of portal hypertension and inversely correlated with advanced PPF and the diameter of the spleenInterference of coagulopathies, some drugs and other live disorders
GGTLow cost. Correlated with more advanced PPF, faster fibrosis progression rate and indicates intrahepatic alterationsInterference of hepatobiliary alterations
Coutinho IndexSimplicity of calculation and low costRequires more tests for use in mild and moderate fibrosis