Standards of liver cirrhosis care in Central Australia

Table 4 Unadjusted and adjusted binary logistic models of Variceal surveillance

Risk factor	Surveillance participation		Comparison	Odds ratio (95%CI)	P value	Odds ratio (95%CI)	P value
	Yes	No		Univariate		Multivariable
Aboriginal Status-Yes	51	90	Yes vs No	0.31 (0.14, 0.65)	0.002	0.29 (0.12, 0.69)	0.005
Age-mean ± SD	51.9 (11.6)	49.2 (11.2)		1.02 (0.99, 1.04)	0.116	1.01 (0.98, 1.04)	0.621
Gender–Male	43	59	Female vs Male	1.00 (0.55, 1.82)	0.995	1.36 (0.70, 2.63)	0.358
Child-Pugh score					0.930		0.950
A	39	51	A vs B	1.13 (0.60, 2.15)	0.703	0.90 (0.45, 1.76)	0.750
B	27	40	A vs C	1.05 (0.39, 2.86)	0.922	0.96 (0.34, 2.71)	0.941
C	8	11	B vs C	0.93 (0.33, 2.61)	0.888	1.07 (0.37, 3.13)	0.900
Residence					0.002
Alice Springs	33	20	AS vs ASC	4.03 (1.55, 10.47)	0.004
Alice Springs camps	9	22	AS vs R	3.05 (1.52, 6.13)	0.002
Rural	33	61	AST vs R	0.76 (0.31, 1.83)	0.535
See specialist liver clinic–Yes	54	39	Yes vs No	4.22 (2.22, 8.02)	< 0.001

AS: Alice Springs; ASC: Alice Springs camps; AST: Aspartate aminotransferase.