Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Hepatol. Feb 27, 2022; 14(2): 338-353
Published online Feb 27, 2022. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i2.338
Published online Feb 27, 2022. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i2.338
Investigation | Sample | Uses | Properties |
Cell culture | |||
Traditional cell culture (human fibroblast cells) | Tissue or non-tissue (blood, urine, oral secretion) sample | Not widely available | Highly specific |
Shell vial assay (centrifugation-amplification technique) | Can be tested for phenotypic susceptibility; Takes a long time (2 to 21 d), more rapid with the shell vial assay (16 h) | ||
Histopathology of organ-specific tissues | |||
Plain histological microscopy | Tissue sample | Gold standard for diagnosis of tissue-invasive CMV disease | Low sensitivity but very high specificity |
Immunohistochemistry | Used for reference of endpoint of treatment of tissue-invasive CMV disease | ||
Molecular diagnosis (detection of viral genome) | |||
Plasma quantitative nucleic acid testing (plasma QNAT) | Blood (plasma or whole blood) | Used to detect CMV DNAemia with high sensitivity; used in diagnosis, surveillance to guide pre-emptive antiviral treatment, and therapeutic monitoring | Generally high sensitivity but less sensitivity in R+ patients |
Tissue QNAT | Tissue sample | Need more clinical trial studies | Better specificity but a lack of studies |
Real-time PCR | Blood | Alternative to conventional plasma QNAT | More rapid and precise |
NASBA assay | Blood | Under study as an alternative to conventional quantitative antigenaemia as a guide for starting pre-emptive therapy | Increased sensitivity for detection of CMV viraemia |
Direct viral pp65 antigen detection | Whole blood or plasma | Diagnosis of CMV infection by detecting antigenaemia; Quantitative result, can guide initiation of pre-emptive therapy | After the blood collection, the sample must be processed within 6 h; False-negatives in patients with neutropenia |
Serological analysis (viral antibody detection) | |||
CMV IgG antibody testing | Plasma | Diagnosis of CMV infection | Better sensitivity and specificity; also positive in past infection |
CMV IgM antibody testing | Pre-transplant assessment for serostatus of the donor and the recipient | Low sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis | |
Viral cellular response detection | |||
QuantiFERON-CMV assay: IFN-γ released measurement | Plasma | Prognostic marker for risk of developing CMV disease: a positive result is associated with a lower incidenceMonitoring during prophylaxis or pre-emptive therapy | High positive predictive value but low negative value |
- Citation: Onpoaree N, Sanpavat A, Sintusek P. Cytomegalovirus infection in liver-transplanted children. World J Hepatol 2022; 14(2): 338-353
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v14/i2/338.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v14.i2.338