Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Hepatol. Jan 27, 2022; 14(1): 244-259
Published online Jan 27, 2022. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i1.244
Published online Jan 27, 2022. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i1.244
Table 1 Computed tomography acquisition parameters in study cohort
CT scanner model | Number of study cases | Detector collimation | Spiral pitch factor | Rotation time (s) | Voltage (kVp) | Tube current-time product at level of liver metastases (mAs) | Noise Index | Reconstruction kernel | Slice thickness/reconstruction interval (mm) | Field of view (cm) | Matrix size (pixels) |
GE Lightspeed RT16 | 16 | 16 × 1.25 mm | 1.375:1 | 0.8 (n = 14); 0.9 (n = 1); 1.0 (n = 1) | 120 (n = 14); 140 (n = 2) | 96-300 | 11.5 | SOFT | 1.25/1.25 | 50 | 512 × 512 |
GE Optima CT540 | 11 | 16 × 1.25 mm | 1.375:1 (n = 9); 0.938:1 (n = 2) | 0.7 (n = 6); 0.8 (n = 4); 0.9 (n = 1) | 120 | 109.6-277.2 | 11.5 -13 | SOFT | 1.25/1.25 | 50 | 512 × 512 |
GE Discovery IQ | 2 | 16 × 1.25 mm | 0.938:1 | 0.8 | 120 | 155.2 and 209.6 | 11-11.5 | SOFT | 1.25/1.25 | 50 | 512 × 512 |
- Citation: Rabe E, Cioni D, Baglietto L, Fornili M, Gabelloni M, Neri E. Can the computed tomography texture analysis of colorectal liver metastases predict the response to first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy? World J Hepatol 2022; 14(1): 244-259
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v14/i1/244.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v14.i1.244