Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Hepatol. Jan 27, 2022; 14(1): 195-208
Published online Jan 27, 2022. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i1.195
Published online Jan 27, 2022. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i1.195
Table 2 Hepatitis C virus therapeutic regimens (n = 532)
| Features of treatment | % (n) |
| Regimens | |
| SOF + DCV + RBV | 49.2% (262) |
| SOF + SMV | 21.2% (113) |
| SOF + DCV | 17.7% (94) |
| SOF + SMV + RBV | 8.1% (43) |
| 3D | 2.3% (12) |
| 3D + RBV | 0.6% (3) |
| SOF + RBV | 0.6% (3) |
| SOF + LED | 0.2% (1) |
| SOF + LED + RBV | 0.2% (1) |
| Duration | |
| 12 wk | 77.2% (411) |
| 24 wk | 22.8% (121) |
| Use of RBV | 58.6% (312) |
| Dose of RBV (mg/kg/day) mean ± SD | 12.11 ± 3.01 |
- Citation: Lourenço MS, Zitelli PMY, Cunha-Silva M, Oliveira AIN, Oliveira CP, Sevá-Pereira T, Carrilho FJ, Pessoa MG, Mazo DF. Direct-acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C treatment: The experience of two tertiary university centers in Brazil. World J Hepatol 2022; 14(1): 195-208
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v14/i1/195.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v14.i1.195