Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Hepatol. Sep 27, 2021; 13(9): 1167-1180
Published online Sep 27, 2021. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v13.i9.1167
Published online Sep 27, 2021. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v13.i9.1167
Table 1 Harm and benefit of hepatitis C virus testing and not testing
Harm of testing (false positives) | Benefit of testing | Harm of not testing (false negatives) | Benefit of not testing |
Low, but existing: | High (for some): | High (for some): | Important in some contexts: |
Cost of tests, human resources (lab & counseling) | If diagnosed positive: good treatment available (high cure rate, few side effects, short /life-saving for cirrhotic patients/ but treatment often not urgent) | Denial of live-saving, highly efficacious and affordable treatment | Cost-saving in resource-constrained environment with many competing interests |
Stress related to waiting for results | Impact on further transmission (but less weight in HCV populations with low risk profile) | ||
Budget allocated to HCV testing not available for other health priorities | |||
Divert resources /timely access from those most in need (in case of testing all) |
- Citation: De Weggheleire A, Buyze J, An S, Thai S, van Griensven J, Francque S, Lynen L. Development of a risk score to guide targeted hepatitis C testing among human immunodeficiency virus patients in Cambodia. World J Hepatol 2021; 13(9): 1167-1180
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v13/i9/1167.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v13.i9.1167