Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Hepatol. Dec 27, 2020; 12(12): 1168-1181
Published online Dec 27, 2020. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v12.i12.1168
Published online Dec 27, 2020. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v12.i12.1168
Management stage | Challenges | Considerations | Approach |
Pre-transplant | Cardiovascular disease | Most common cause of death in MAFLD patients; Older patients with multiple comorbidities driving cardiovascular risk, disease may be subclinical; Pharmacologic optimisation of risk factors can be limited by liver dysfunction e.g., statins, beta blockade, anti-platelets agents | Rigorous pre-transplant assessment including stress echocardiography and coronary angiography in high risk patients; Risk factor modification as per general population |
T2DM | Pre-LT diabetes associated with reduced survival post-LT; Poor glycemic control immediately pre-LT and peri- LT increases surgical complications | Tight glycemic control during waitlist period and peri-operative; Multidisciplinary approach to diabetic management | |
Renal dysfunction | Multifactorial in MAFLD, with hypertension and T2DM; Even mild disease at time of LT associated with higher risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality | Prevent even small deterioration in renal function prior to LT; Consider simultaneous liver kidney transplant where indicated | |
Nutrition | Pre-LT nutrition has major influence on post-LT morbidity, mortality and hospital stay; Assessment is difficult in obese patients and those with ascites; Sarcopenic obesity and myosteatosis are common. Risk factors for long term mortality | Specialist nutritional consultation prior to transplant with assessment for sarcopenia; High energy, high protein diet with enteral feeding if required | |
Peri-operative | Obesity | More common in MAFLD than other etiologies; Peri-operative challenges e.g., surgical technique, wound infection and dehiscence, biliary complications; Balancing healthy weight loss in pre-LT period with muscle loss and sarcopenia; Exercise often limited by frailty and possible transient increases in portal pressure with excessive strain | Controlled weight loss in pre-LT period ensuring protein requirements met. Very low-calorie diets not recommendedBariatric surgery pre-LT or simultaneously with LT in highly selected patients. Sleeve gastrectomy preferred over laparoscopic banding or gastric bypass |
Donor steatosis | Donor steatosis > 30% is a risk factor for primary graft non-function and graft loss; Balancing risk of complications with steatotic donors against organ availability and demand | Assessment of hepatic steatosis at all stages of organ procurement; Future possibilities with machine perfusion and liver reconditioning | |
Cardiovascular risk | NASH patients more likely to have cardiovascular events in the post-operative period | Careful pre-operative assessment to predict risk; Close perioperative monitoring | |
Post-transplant | Recurrent MAFLD | Due to non-dynamic genetic, metabolic and behavioural factors, 50% of MAFLD transplant recipients have recurrent MAFLD post-LT | Choice of less diabetogenic immunosuppression regimen e.g., steroid free protocols, CNI sparing; Lifestyle and behavioural modification and traditional risk factor modifications e.g., hyperlipidemia, hypertension as per general population |
De novo MAFLD | Contributors to new MAFLD post-LT include diabetogenic medications e.g., CNI, steroids, obesity related to steroids, inactivity and return of appetite | As above |
- Citation: Gill MG, Majumdar A. Metabolic associated fatty liver disease: Addressing a new era in liver transplantation. World J Hepatol 2020; 12(12): 1168-1181
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v12/i12/1168.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v12.i12.1168