Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Hepatol. Nov 27, 2020; 12(11): 1115-1127
Published online Nov 27, 2020. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v12.i11.1115
Published online Nov 27, 2020. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v12.i11.1115
Table 2 Comparison of thromboelastography and rotational thrombelastometry parameters
Measurement | TEG | ROTEM | |
Period of initial fibrin formation | Time (min) to reach an amplitude of 2 mm | Reaction time (R) | Clotting time |
Clot kinetics | Time (min) for clot amplitude to increase from 2 mm to 20 mm | Kinetics time (K) | Clot formation time |
Clot kinetics | Angle of tangent line from clot initiation to the slope of the developing curve | Alpha angle (α) | Alpha angle (α) |
Maximum clot strength | Peak amplitude (mm) | Maximum amplitude | Maximum clot firmness |
Clot stability/fibrinolysis | Percent reduction in curve at 30 and 60 minutes | Lysis 30 (LY30) and lysis 60 (LY60) | Lysis index 30 (LI 30) |
- Citation: Wei H, Child LJ. Clinical utility of viscoelastic testing in chronic liver disease: A systematic review. World J Hepatol 2020; 12(11): 1115-1127
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v12/i11/1115.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v12.i11.1115