Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Hepatol. Oct 27, 2020; 12(10): 850-862
Published online Oct 27, 2020. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v12.i10.850
Table 4 Performance of the novel markers when compared to the traditional tools
Cutoff value
PLT/SD ratio above 872
FIB-4 above 3.25
ABI below 0.94
LDL/PLT ratio above 1
CIMT above 1.1
VLDL below 16.5
P value
n909070989676
LS (kPa)24.4 ± 6.226. 5 ± 5.222 ± 8.223 ± 724.6 ± 6.725.3 ± 6.3F = 1.87, P = 0.117
ABI1.08 ± 0.091.09 ± 0.10.887 ± 0.040.93 ± 0.10.88 ± 0.10.96 ± 0.08F = 30, P = 0.001
Endoscopy-------
EVs, n (%)82/90 (91.1)56/90 (62.2)65/70 (92.9)92/98 (94)90/96 (93.8)68/76 (89.5)P = 0.001
Grade I-II, n (%)26/32 (81.3)14/32 (35)20/32 (62.5)24/32 (75)24/32 (75)10/32 (31.3)χ2 = 13.3, P = 0.009
Grade III, n (%)32/42 (76.2)30/42 (71.4)30/42 (71.4)42/42 (100)40/42 (95)34/42 (81)χ2= 7.67, P = 0.104
Grade IV, n (%)14/16 (87.5)6/16 (37.5)9/16 (56.3)16/16 (100)16/16 (100)12/16 (75)χ2= 9.55, P = 0.048
Fundal varix, n (%)10/12 (83.3)6/12 (50)6/12 (50)10/12 (83)10/12 (83)12/12 (100)χ2= 3.47,P = 0.48