Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Hepatol. Oct 27, 2020; 12(10): 693-708
Published online Oct 27, 2020. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v12.i10.693
Published online Oct 27, 2020. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v12.i10.693
Ref. | Study type | Intervention | Sample size | Conversion to resection | Tumor response |
Jarnagin et al[77], 2009 | Phase II trial | HAI | 26 | 1 (4%) | 14 PR, 11 SD, 1PD |
Kemeny et al[78], 2011 | Phase II trail | HAI + bevacizumab | 18 | 3 (17%) | 7 PR, 11 SD |
Konstantinidis et al[79], 2015 | Retrospective | HAI + chemotherapy | 93 | 8 (4%) | NR |
Massani et al[80], 2015 | Retrospective | HAI | 11 | 3 (27%) | 5 PR, 2 SD, |
Tanaka et al[113], 2002 | Retrospective | HAI | 11 | 1 (9%) | 7 PR, 2 SD, 2 PD |
Shitara et al[114], 2008 | Retrospective | HAI | 20 | NR | 1CR, 9PR, 8 SD, 2PD |
Ghiringhelli et al[115], 2013 | Retrospective | HAI | 12 | 2 (17%) | 8 PR, 3 SD, 1 PD |
- Citation: Akateh C, Ejaz AM, Pawlik TM, Cloyd JM. Neoadjuvant treatment strategies for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Hepatol 2020; 12(10): 693-708
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v12/i10/693.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v12.i10.693