Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Hepatol. Aug 27, 2019; 11(8): 646-655
Published online Aug 27, 2019. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v11.i8.646
Table 4 Comparison of studies describing various interventions targeted to improve outcomes after hospital discharge in cirrhotic patients
Ref.Intervention typeNumber of patientsTiming of interventionUnplanned readmission rate
Mortality
1 mo3 mo6 mo1 mo3 mo6 mo
Wigg et al[8], 2013Chronic disease management programC:20 T:4012 mo after dischargeC: 0.4/person/yr T: 1/person/yr1C: 15% 1T: 10%
Morando et al[10], 2013Care management checkup modelC: 60 T: 4012 mo after dischargeC: 42% T: 15%NANA1C: 46% 1T: 23%
Tapper et al[9], 2016Handheld (1st phase) and electronic (2nd phase) checklistsC: 626 T: 1st: 470 2nd: 624Inpatient stayC: 38% T: 1st: 35% 2nd: 27%NANANAC: 20% T: 1st: 15% 2nd: 21%NA
Kanwal et al[7], 2016Early follow up in clinicC: 17094 T: 8123At dischargeC: 14% T: 15%NANAC: 5% T: 3%NANA
Current studyOutpatient telephonic transitional careC: 93 T: 7630 d after dischargeC: 38% T: 37%C: 55% T: 57%C: 62% T: 65%C: 10% T: 5%C: 24% T: 13%C: 31% T: 16%