Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Hepatol. Aug 27, 2019; 11(8): 646-655
Published online Aug 27, 2019. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v11.i8.646
Published online Aug 27, 2019. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v11.i8.646
Multivariate analysis | ||
Factor | HR (95%CI) | P value |
Intervention vs controls | 0.4 (0.2-0.82) | 0.012 |
Age | 1.01 (0.99-1.04) | 0.503 |
Female gender | 1.2 (0.6-2.4) | 0.605 |
Etiology of cirrhosis | ||
EtOH vs HCV | 0.72 (0.29-1.8) | 0.48 |
NAFLD vs HCV | 0.41 (0.24-2.1) | 0.088 |
MELD score (for every 1 unit increment) | 1.05 (1.01-1.1) | 0.024 |
Index hospitalization length of stay (for every 1 d increment) | 0.99 (0.95-1.02) | 0.47 |
Discharge to home with home care vs home | 1.65 (0.75-3.64) | 0.212 |
Discharge to SNF vs home | 1.4 (0.56-3.48) | 0.47 |
- Citation: Rao BB, Sobotka A, Lopez R, Romero-Marrero C, Carey W. Outpatient telephonic transitional care after hospital discharge improves survival in cirrhotic patients. World J Hepatol 2019; 11(8): 646-655
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v11/i8/646.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v11.i8.646