Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Hepatol. Feb 27, 2019; 11(2): 199-207
Published online Feb 27, 2019. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v11.i2.199
Published online Feb 27, 2019. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v11.i2.199
Table 2 Performance scores for patients undergoing major liver resections in a low volume Caribbean center
Grade | ECOG Performance status | n (%) |
0 | Fully active, able to carry out all activities without restriction | 10 (14.5) |
1 | Restricted in physically strenuous activity, but ambulatory and able to carry out light work | 20 (29) |
2 | Ambulatory and capable of self care, but unable to carry out work activities. Up and about > 50% of waking hours | 33 (47.8) |
3 | Capable of limited self care and confined to bed or chair for more than 50% of waking hours | 5 (7.3) |
4 | Completely disabled and cannot carry on self care. Confined to bed or chair | 1 (1.5) |
5 | Dead | 0 |
- Citation: Cawich SO, Maharaj R, Naraynsingh V, Pearce N, Francis W, Bonadie KO, Thomas DA. Clinical outcomes after major hepatectomy are acceptable in low-volume centers in the Caribbean. World J Hepatol 2019; 11(2): 199-207
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v11/i2/199.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v11.i2.199