Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Stem Cells. Jan 26, 2015; 7(1): 37-50
Published online Jan 26, 2015. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v7.i1.37
Table 1 Examples of studies, which have demonstrated surface topographies can direct stem cell differentiation
Stem cell sourceScaffold typeDescription of topographical featureDifferentiation outcomeRef.
hMSCPDMSIslandsLarge 10000 μm2 islands promoted osteogenesis. Small 1024 μm2 island promoted adipogenesisMcBeath et al[25]
hMSCTiO2 nanotubes30-, 50, -70 and 100 nm nanotubes70-100 nm nanotubes promoted osteogenesisOh et al[28]
hMSCPMMAOrdered and disordered square or hexagonal pattern and NanopitsDisordered squared promoted osteogenesisDalby et al[31]
hBMDSCHydrogenated amorphous carbonGroovesNeurogenesisD’Angelo et al[37]
mESCPLLAGratingOsteogensisSmith et al[38]
hMSCPDMSGratingNeurogenesisYim et al[39]
hESCPDMSMicropatterned fibronectin with square shape surrounded by Pluronic F127Myogenesis and chondrogenesisGao et al[49]
hMSCPDMSMicropatterned with striped groove morphology coated with collagen type I.MyogenesisKurpinski et al[50]
hNSCPDMSMicropatterned with striped groove morphology coated with PLL and laminin.NeuronalBéduer et al[51]
hMSCPDMSMicropatterned with striped groove morphology coated with collagen type INeuronalBiehl et al[52]
hESCPDMSGrooveNeuronalLu et al[53]
hMSCPCLNanopillar, nanohole and nanogrillNanopillar and nanohole topography enhancedWu et al[54]
hNSCPUAGroove and PillarMSC chondrogenesis and facilitated hyaline cartilage. NeuronalYang et al[55]
rMSCsPolystyreneGrooveMyogenesis and adipogenesisWang et al[56]