Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Stem Cells. Apr 26, 2025; 17(4): 102945
Published online Apr 26, 2025. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v17.i4.102945
Table 1 Comparison of stem cell types
Stem cell source
Harvesting method
Differentiation potential
Anti-inflammatory action
Applicable scenarios
Prospects for IVDD repair application
BMSCsBone marrow extraction, complex procedureMultipotent differentiation potential, can differentiate into NPCs and AF cellsSecretes TGF-β, IGF-1, VEGF; regulates ECM metabolism, reduces NP cell apoptosis and inflammationSuitable for severe disc damageDemonstrates repair potential in in vivo and in vitro studies and early clinical research; long-term efficacy still requires validation
ADSCsFat extraction, relatively simpleMultipotent differentiation ability, promotes ECM productionSecretes anti-inflammatory factors, helps reduce NP cell apoptosis and inflammationMinimally invasive treatment, suitable for wide applicationShows promising results in preclinical studies; combining with materials like hydrogels can enhance therapeutic effects
UC-MSCsExtraction from umbilical cord tissue, easy to obtainMultipotent differentiation potential, high proliferative capacitySecretes TGF-β, VEGF, IL-10; exhibits significant anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic effectsSuitable for allogeneic transplantation and large-scale treatment, low immunogenicityShows good results in preclinical studies; can be further optimized with gene editing and exosome technologies
ProNPsExtraction from the disc, relatively complexDifferentiates into mature NP cellsPromotes NP tissue regeneration through paracrine effectsSuitable for NP regeneration, high potentialPromotes ECM production by activating specific signaling pathways, high future application potential