Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Stem Cells. Mar 26, 2025; 17(3): 102067
Published online Mar 26, 2025. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v17.i3.102067
Published online Mar 26, 2025. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v17.i3.102067
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of randomized clinical trials with cryopreserved human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells for heart disease, n (%)
Ref. | He et al[20], 2020, China | Bartolucci et al[21], 2017, Chile | Ulus et al[19], 2020, Turkey | |
Study type | RCT | RCT | Open-label RCT | |
Phase | I | I/II | I/II | |
Condition | MI | HF | MI | |
Sample size | Total | 50 | 30 | 41 |
Intervention (% male) | 35 (71.42) | 15 (80.0) | 25 (100) | |
Control (% male) | 15 (46.67) | 15 (93.3) | 16 (100) | |
Age (mean ± SD) | Intervention | 61 ± 8.2 | 57.33 ± 10.05 | 61.8 ± 10 |
Control | 65.2 ± 7.9 | 57.20 ± 11.64 | 65.3 ± 6.8 | |
BMI (mean ± SD) | Intervention | 25 ± 3.35 | 29.12 ± 2.88 | 26.5 ± 4.5 |
Control | 23.59 ± 2.28 | 29.52 ± 4.00 | 26.6 ± 4.8 | |
Number of smokers | Intervention | 11 (31.43) | 7 (46.7) | 21 (84) |
Control | 3 (25.0) | 4 (26.7) | 15 (88.2) | |
HTN | Intervention | 24 (68.57) | 7 (46.7) | 15 (60) |
Control | 9 (75.0) | 8 (53.3) | 11 (64.7) | |
DM | Intervention | 12 (34.29) | 5 (33.3) | 16 (66.7) |
Control | 8 (66.7) | 7 (46.7) | 9 (52.9) | |
NYHA; I (n), II (n), III (n), IV (n) | Intervention | III (4/8), IV (12/8) | N/S: 2.03 ± 0.61 | N/S: 1.9 ± 0.44 |
Control | III (7) IV (5) | N/S: 1.67 ± 0.49 | N/S: 2.1 ± 0.37 | |
Comparison | CABG only | Placebo | CABG only | |
Follow-up | 3, 6, and 12 months | 3, 6, and 12 months | 1, 3, 6, and 12 months | |
Assessment modality (yes/no) | ECG | No | Yes | Yes |
Echo | No | Yes | Yes | |
MRI | Yes (CMR) | Yes (CMR) | Yes | |
Cardiac CT | No | No | No | |
SPECT | No | No | Yes | |
Measured outcomes | Serious adverse events at 12 months (primary), the efficacy of hUC-MSCs and collagen scaffold assessed according to the CV-CMR–based LVEF and infarct size at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment, and NYHA (secondary) | Safety: Adverse events after IV infusion -/-. Efficacy: Primary, changes in LVEF, LVESV & LVEDV by Echo; LVEF, LVESV, and LVEDV by CMR; NYHA score (secondary) | LVEF, LV remodeling, myocardial mass, 6MWD, NYHA score change |
- Citation: Safwan M, Bourgleh MS, Haider KH. Clinical experience with cryopreserved mesenchymal stem cells for cardiovascular applications: A systematic review. World J Stem Cells 2025; 17(3): 102067
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-0210/full/v17/i3/102067.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v17.i3.102067