Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Stem Cells. Jun 26, 2024; 16(6): 623-640
Published online Jun 26, 2024. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v16.i6.623
Published online Jun 26, 2024. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v16.i6.623
Ref. | Model type | Cell source and pre-treatment | Main findings | |
Pre-treatment of MSCs by physical manipulation | ||||
Izadpanah et al[103], 2022 | In vitro | 5-Aza treatment + static and microfluidic cell culture systems | 5-Aza induced cardiac-specific markers in MSCs, but this induction was significantly increased after exposure to both 5-Aza and shear stress, showing their synergistic effects vs 5-Aza or in shear stress-only groups. These results demonstrated that MSCs’ exposure to 5-Aza and shear stress is required for high-level cardiac gene expression | |
Manjua et al[104], 2021 | In vitro/in vivo models for angiogenesis | MSCs exposed to magnetic pre-treatment | MSCs cultured on polyvinylalcohol and gelatin-based scaffolds containing iron oxide nanoparticles were exposed to a magnetic field. The cells showed significantly increased VEGF-A production and altered their morphology and alignment. MSCs’ angiogenic potential was observed by the increase in angiogenic response using conditioned media in vitro and in vivo | |
Helms et al[105], 2020 | In vitro | AD-SCs pre-treated with TSB or mechanical stimulation or their combined action | The study was intended to show if mechanical stimulation can support or replace TSB-induced differentiation of Ad-SCs. ASC or pre-differentiated SMC exposed to pulsatile perfusion for ten days with or without TSB resulted in collagen-I expression and circumferential orientation of the cells around the lumen. Molecular studies showed upregulation of αSMA and calponin expression. On the other hand, contractility and smoothelin expression required both mechanical and TSB stimulation | |
Vaez et al[106], 2018 | BM-MSCs in static 2D and microfluidic cell culture systems | There was a clear but insignificant difference between the beating rate of APCs and CNCs in both 2D and the microfluidic system during 30 d. Data from RT-PCR showed GATA4, Nkx2.5, CX43, cTnI, cTnT, and β-MHC induction during four weeks more in microfluidic chips than those co-cultured in 24-well plates. Combined shear stress and co-culture with cardiomyocytes significantly enhanced the differentiation rate vs co-culture alone | ||
Popa et al[107], 2016 | In vitro | hAD-SCs pre-treated by MNPs integrated in κC hydrogels | The MNP concentration in the κC hydrogels significantly influenced the cell viability, cell content, and metabolic activity. The optimal MNP concentration was 5% in κC. Exposure to magnetic actuation further altered their gene expression profile, favoring chondrogenic phenotype induction | |
Shi et al[108], 2011 | In vitro | MSCs’ exposure to CCMT | RhoA activity after CCMT stimulation was reduced. Pre-treatment of CCMT-stimulated MSCs with LPA, a RhoA activator, recovered ALP activity and Runx2 expression. In contrast, pre-treatment with C3 toxin, a RhoA inhibitor, reduced ALP activity with a concomitant reduction in Runx2. These results showed inhibition of Runx2 expression after the RhoA-ERK1/2 pathway mediates CCMT stimulation | |
Liu et al[109], 2011 | hMSCs under perfusion culture system to produce FSS | hMSCs subjected to a perfusion culture system to produce FSS, which activated ERK1/2. The pre-treatment enhanced the pro-osteogenic gene expression profile in the cells via activating NF-κB and BMP. FSS inducing the osteogenic differentiation of hMSCs will provide new targets for osteoporosis and related bone-wasting diseases | ||
Kasten et al[110], 2010 | In vitro | BM-MSCs subjected integrin integrin-induced and inhomogeneous magnetic force exposure | Exposure to inhomogeneous magnetic forces increased Sox 9 (a marker of chondrogenesis) and decreased ALP expression. Molecular studies showed that VEGF induction induced by physical forces involved Akt activation. The results showed that the biological functions of MSCs can be stimulated by pretreatment with integrin-mediated mechanical forces and inhomogeneous magnetic field exposure | |
Pre-treatment of MSCs by genetic manipulation | ||||
Li et al[111], 2023 | In vitro and mice model of PD | hMSCs overexpressing VEGF189 | hMSC overexpressing VEGF189-GFP significantly increased VEGF expression and slightly increased viability of the cells vs naïve cells. Transplantation of VEGF expressing MSCs significantly improved mechanical allodynia and inhibited the site’s TRPV1 expression. TRPV1 agonists could partially block such pain relief effects. There was no tumorigenicity or neuron degeneration in hMSCs expressing VEGF189-GFP | |
Yu et al[112], 2023 | In vitro and in vivo mice model of alkali-burned cornea | AD-MSCs overexpressing IGF-1 | Treatment with MSCs overexpressing IGF-1 significantly recovered corneal morphology and function vs control and IGF-1 protein eyedrops. The healing of corneal epithelium and limbus, the inhibition of corneal stromal fibrosis, angiogenesis, and lymphangiogenesis, and the repair of corneal nerves were observed. In vitro experiments showed that MSCs with IGF-1 promoted trigeminal ganglion cell activity and maintained limbal stem cells’ stemness | |
Singh et al[113], 2018 | In vitro | Pharmacological and genetic manipulation of MSCs to enhance survivin | Induction of survivin is essential for MSC survival, expansion, lineage commitment, and migrational potential. On the other hand, pharmacological or genetic blockade of survivin expression in mouse and human BM-MSC increased caspase 3 and 7 expression and reduced proliferation, resulting in fewer MSC and clonogenic colony-forming unit-fibroblasts, growth factor (i.e., b-FGF or PDGF)-mediated survivin modulation represents a novel therapeutic strategy | |
Konoplyannikov et al[114], 2013 | In vitro and in vivo in rat model of MI | Simultaneous overexpression of IGF-1, VEGF, sSDF-1a, HGF-1 in SKM | Overexpression of four growth factors led to the induction of multiple angiogenic and pro-survival factors, including secreted frizzled-related protein-1,2,4,5, matrix metalloproteinases-3 and 9, connexin-43, netrin-1, Nos-2, Wnt-3, Akt, MAPK42/44, Stat3, NFκB, HIF-1α, and protein kinase C. Transplantation of the genetically modified cells causes extensive neomyogenesis and angiogenesis in the infarcted heart, attenuating infarct size and improving global heart function at eight weeks vs control animals. There was also massive mobilization and homing of stem/progenitor cells from the peripheral circulation, the bone marrow, and the heart for participation in infarcted myocardium repair | |
Jiang et al[115], 2006 | In vitro and in vivo study in rat model of MI | Rat BM-MSCs are co-overexpressing Ang-1 and Akt | MSCs co-overexpressing Ang-1 and Akt survived better under anoxia vs naïve MSCs. At two weeks after cell transplantation, MAAs survived significantly more than the naïve MSCs in the infarcted heart. The heart function indices were significantly improved LVEF and fractional shortening vs control | |
Ye et al[116], 2005 | In vitro and in vivo using a rat model of acute MI | SKMs genetically modulated to overexpress VEGF | The genetically modified cells expressed copious amounts of VEGF. Transplantation of the cells into the infarcted heart significantly increased blood vessel density compared to control animals. LVEF and fractional shortening were improved considerably compared to control-treated animals, and regional flow improved |
- Citation: Haider KH. Priming mesenchymal stem cells to develop “super stem cells”. World J Stem Cells 2024; 16(6): 623-640
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-0210/full/v16/i6/623.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v16.i6.623